Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Malware Protection Test March 2022
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anthony Qian" data-source="post: 984601" data-attributes="member: 91446"><p>What I want to emphasize is that Avast's CyberCapture is not the same as ESET's LiveGuard/EDTD. For most harmful samples, CyberCapture won't send them as a whole to its cloud for analysis; only a few suspicious ones will be sent. As a result, in my testing, many dangerous samples (for example, MBR killer) were rated as "safe to open" by local heuristics, without being sent to the cloud.</p><p></p><p>LiveGuard is different, everything unknown will be sent to the cloud sandbox for analysis.</p><p></p><p>In short, the threshold for sending files to the cloud differs, and CyberCapture relies more on its local heuristic engine and LiveGuard relies solely on its cloud sandbox.</p><p></p><p>I also want to mention another cloud-based detection technology from Avira - Avira Protection Cloud (APC). APC also uses local heuristics when deciding whether or not to send a file to the cloud. It primarily uses cloud-based heuristics to reach a decision in the cloud, allowing it to display results in seconds. It outperforms the above two in terms of detection rate in my testing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anthony Qian, post: 984601, member: 91446"] What I want to emphasize is that Avast's CyberCapture is not the same as ESET's LiveGuard/EDTD. For most harmful samples, CyberCapture won't send them as a whole to its cloud for analysis; only a few suspicious ones will be sent. As a result, in my testing, many dangerous samples (for example, MBR killer) were rated as "safe to open" by local heuristics, without being sent to the cloud. LiveGuard is different, everything unknown will be sent to the cloud sandbox for analysis. In short, the threshold for sending files to the cloud differs, and CyberCapture relies more on its local heuristic engine and LiveGuard relies solely on its cloud sandbox. I also want to mention another cloud-based detection technology from Avira - Avira Protection Cloud (APC). APC also uses local heuristics when deciding whether or not to send a file to the cloud. It primarily uses cloud-based heuristics to reach a decision in the cloud, allowing it to display results in seconds. It outperforms the above two in terms of detection rate in my testing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top