malwarekiller's setup (Updated)

[malwarekiller]

MBAM is heavy!! I am giving about 46MB of RAM on both idle and working On PC...

In total with avast and comodo[both light on ram] and MBAM i am giving about 56MB of my ram on idle and about 66MB on non-idle..

 

[jamescv7]

RE: New security setup.

I assume you have addons/extensions that were installed on Google Chrome and IE9 beside your set already.

 

[McLovin]

RE: New security setup.

I know that you might be advanced but I have not seen any backup solutions?

Here is a list:

• Acronis True Image Home 2012
• Paragon Drive Backup 10 Professional
• Norton Ghost 15
• O&O DiskImage 5 Professional Edition
• Image for Windows 2.58

Hope that this helps

 

[malwarekiller]

RE: New security setup.

i have rollback RX for backups

extensions for both IE and chrome

 

[malbky]

RE: New security setup.

Nothings wrong i see. Tight config. Just have something for backup.

 

[Ink]

RE: malwarekiller's New security setup

Which Auto-Sandbox are you using (Avast or Comodo)?

Latest NPE is version 2.5.

 

[malwarekiller]

RE: malwarekiller's New security setup

currently i have both autosandboxe's [avast and comodo] running.

comodo will catch a lot and avast will also get a many of them.

 

[jamescv7]

RE: malwarekiller's New security setup[UPDATED]

Well i think they have a different function of autosandbox as Avast uses heuristics to detect and when bypassed then it will go Comodo Sandbox for restrictions. So its ok.

 

[malwarekiller]

RE: malwarekiller's New security setup[UPDATED]

Thats the reason i have both sandboxes running all the time

 

[Ink]

RE: malwarekiller's New security setup[UPDATED]

What's your reason for running lots of scanners, for a Malware Remover, do you test them on your system?

 

[malwarekiller]

RE: malwarekiller's New security setup[UPDATED]

What's your reason for running lots of scanners, for a Malware Remover, do you test them on your system?

emsisoft is actually with me because i am learning on how to use its tools like blitzblank....i removed NPE...MBAM and HMP are for my on-demand stuff....comodo autoruns and killswitch i use to get a good insight of my system on what i am running...i like to know what my system is running. :blush:

 

[malwarekiller]

Malwarekiller's new config

MBAM is heavy!! I am giving about 46MB of RAM on both idle and working On PC...

In total with avast and comodo[both light on ram] and MBAM i am giving about 56MB of my ram on idle and about 66MB on non-idle..

 

[Plexx]

RE: Malwarekiller's new config

Acronis does run by default processes on the background even if you don't have set any scheduled task. This was one of the main reasons I moved from it. Also which version you are using?

If you think MBAM is heavy, try this combo: NOD32/ESS + MBAM in real time. ESET by default will chunk 80mb but then again I didn't experience any slow down. Bear in mind I have activated the trial of MBAM on the ESET combo I am testing in VM.

 

[malwarekiller]

RE: Malwarekiller's new config

If you think MBAM is heavy, try this combo: NOD32/ESS + MBAM in real time. ESET by default will chunk 80mb but then again I didn't experience any slow down. Bear in mind I have activated the trial of MBAM on the ESET combo I am testing in VM.

Umm..well i think i stay with what works for me...ESET will make it more heavy and more ever i have seen people using eset and land up getting highly infected..whereas with avast the user is infected with random 2 to 4 trojans and nothing else so i prefer avast is better than ESET...This is lightest config at max what u see now..MBAM wont come down anyways..:sleepy: No slowdowns so far for me with my config

 

[Plexx]

RE: Malwarekiller's new config

ESET problem is not detection. Its the cleaning potentials.

Also although ram usage is 80mb, doesnt mean it is heavy for an average user. I do remember reading somewhere the reason why it takes around 80mb. I think its the signatures but not fully sure.

If you want to see heavy and slow down look at BD or KAV

 

[malwarekiller]

RE: Malwarekiller's new config

ESET problem is not detection. Its the cleaning potentials.

Then why i see people running up to date ESET alone getting very highly infected and people running avast alone just getting infected with a couple of trojans anyway,i dont want to destroy my PC with ESET high RAM usage...i yet think avast does very well in prevention :blush: no offense to ESET though...I like both of them but yet have my personal like on avast and this config is yet the lightest one i get with mbam as i see


OBS. forgot to mention comodo killswitch and autoruns and my addons...so ADDED THEM