Battle Mcafee Total or Eset Internet Security

[KonradPL]

Hi

Best possible protection with lightness - multi device license for windows and android
Which one would be a better choice?

 

[Anthony Qian]

1. Yes

McAfee Support – The Page You Are Looking for Has Been Moved

kc.mcafee.com

2. Sorry but if... If McAfee doesn't know about a threat, the file passes without reaction.....

3. I was mainly talking about its memory and CPU consumption that I could see on Virtual Machine

1. I cannot find the keyword, AI, in your provided article.
2. You should test more samples and make sure Real Protect is running normally on your system (Test files to test Real Protect scanning and Credential Theft Protection).
3. I don't think so.

 

[bribon77]

Although McAfee has improved a lot, in terms of detection and performance, I think I would choose Eset, it is an AV that has always been there, without many ups and downs.

 

[Shadowra]

1. I cannot find the keyword, AI, in your provided article.
2. You should test more samples and make sure Real Protect is running normally on your system (Test files to test Real Protect scanning and Credential Theft Protection).
3. I don't think so.
View attachment 261552

A video is planned on McAfee

For the consumption, look with ProcessExplorer or other, not with Windows

 

[Anthony Qian]

A video is planned on McAfee

For the consumption, look with ProcessExplorer or other, not with Windows

My advice is to familiarize yourself with the AV before putting it to the test. Otherwise, the result you get could be biased.

When it comes to measuring resource consumption, there is no difference between using Process Explorer and the built-in task manager. You should, however, compare the overall RAM usage before and after installation, to measure the actual RAM used by AVs. In this case, McAfee uses approximately 200 MB of RAM on my system.

 

[Shadowra]

My advice is to familiarize yourself with the AV before putting it to the test. Otherwise, the result you get could be biased.

When it comes to measuring resource consumption, there is no difference between using Process Explorer and the built-in task manager. You should, however, compare the overall RAM usage before and after installation, to measure the actual RAM used by AVs. In this case, McAfee uses approximately 200 MB of RAM on my system.

It is already on one of my VMs since a few days

For the 2nd point, I always prefer to check with another task manager, Windows doesn't tell everything Then everyone does as he wants

 

[Anthony Qian]

It is already on one of my VMs since a few days

For the 2nd point, I always prefer to check with another task manager, Windows doesn't tell everything Then everyone does as he wants

In fact, Process Explorer is also developed by Microsoft.

 

[Shadowra]

In fact, Process Explorer is also developed by Microsoft.

I know, but much more complete. (VirusTotal API, more vision on RAM, better detailed etc etc)

 

[alakazam]

It is already on one of my VMs since a few days

Did you make the video?