Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 837095" data-attributes="member: 32547">I think everyone is getting this story wrong.&nbsp; I found the master list, which contains most of the extensions that have been added.&nbsp; That list is 104 processes.&nbsp; Yet, there are 8 more, including 6 java processes that are not even in MS&#039; master list.&nbsp; I counted all together 112 process types that are banned.&nbsp; Here is the master with the new file types:[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://support.office.com/en-us/article/blocked-attachments-in-outlook-434752e1-02d3-4e90-9124-8b81e49a8519#ID0EAABAAA=Newer_versions[/URL]That&#039;s the 104.&nbsp; From the list of new ones I have been seeing everywhere there are the 8 more to bring the total to 112.&nbsp; Appears the news services are reporting incorrectly that there will be 142 blocked now.&nbsp; idk, maybe I am wrong, but it&#039;s a pretty handy list for protecting vulnerable applications...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 837095, member: 32547"] I think everyone is getting this story wrong. I found the master list, which contains most of the extensions that have been added. That list is 104 processes. Yet, there are 8 more, including 6 java processes that are not even in MS' master list. I counted all together 112 process types that are banned. Here is the master with the new file types: [URL unfurl="true"]https://support.office.com/en-us/article/blocked-attachments-in-outlook-434752e1-02d3-4e90-9124-8b81e49a8519#ID0EAABAAA=Newer_versions[/URL] That's the 104. From the list of new ones I have been seeing everywhere there are the 8 more to bring the total to 112. Appears the news services are reporting incorrectly that there will be 142 blocked now. idk, maybe I am wrong, but it's a pretty handy list for protecting vulnerable applications... [/QUOTE]

Verification