Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Microsoft Defender Antivirus + Windows 11 Smart App Control (SAC)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 114834" data-source="post: 1095657"><p>Its certainly worth looking into or considering as additional methods to test other modules of a product more accurately. Although you are correct in both posts, as the number of samples has a lot to do with it as well. Then again the chances of typical users running into that much malware would probably be like hitting the lottery although I do account for the variables that you are referring too with such a large sample. Either way, all testing has its purpose and I would never claim other wise, but I feel its unfair to products and companies to state a product has failed if it has not been proven to have run the full gauntlet of its design and modules.</p><p></p><p>Disclaimer: [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] this has no bearing on your test above, I just took the opportunity to ask one of the forum professionals his take on testing products.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 114834, post: 1095657"] Its certainly worth looking into or considering as additional methods to test other modules of a product more accurately. Although you are correct in both posts, as the number of samples has a lot to do with it as well. Then again the chances of typical users running into that much malware would probably be like hitting the lottery although I do account for the variables that you are referring too with such a large sample. Either way, all testing has its purpose and I would never claim other wise, but I feel its unfair to products and companies to state a product has failed if it has not been proven to have run the full gauntlet of its design and modules. Disclaimer: [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] this has no bearing on your test above, I just took the opportunity to ask one of the forum professionals his take on testing products. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
