Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Microsoft Defender can be disabled
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1061330"><p>Yes but [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] point is that all tests are to small to be statistically relevant. When the set is to small, one can only say that product A is inferior to product B when tested against that specific sample set. When the sample set is to small, one can not generalize the outcome as factual and proven.</p><p></p><p>Just explaining, I am with Andy that he is theoretically right, but because his critique also applies on professional test, I realize that we have to live with to small test samples as a fact of life, that is why I enjoy viewing good test setups (like your sophisticated small sample set approach or the gangbang approach of [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER]).</p><p></p><p>Ideally one would like to see products doing well in professional tests AND youtube experts and enthousiasts tests. When your tests show that a product has problems with scriptors, I usually take that as true and something to worry about and I would try to find a safety net for that weakness (e.g combining SWH with Avast in hardended mode or Defender in MAX protection).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1061330"] Yes but [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] point is that all tests are to small to be statistically relevant. When the set is to small, one can only say that product A is inferior to product B when tested against that specific sample set. When the sample set is to small, one can not generalize the outcome as factual and proven. Just explaining, I am with Andy that he is theoretically right, but because his critique also applies on professional test, I realize that we have to live with to small test samples as a fact of life, that is why I enjoy viewing good test setups (like your sophisticated small sample set approach or the gangbang approach of [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER]). Ideally one would like to see products doing well in professional tests AND youtube experts and enthousiasts tests. When your tests show that a product has problems with scriptors, I usually take that as true and something to worry about and I would try to find a safety net for that weakness (e.g combining SWH with Avast in hardended mode or Defender in MAX protection). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top