Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 994888" data-attributes="member: 32260">I noticed such behavior on the low-resource computer when the machine was updating the system or Microsoft Store apps. But, after finishing the updates and .NET optimization, the machine is mostly usable (with an Intel Atom processor).The performance of Windows Defender (now Microsoft Defender) is well known and well tested. Some time ago I made a thread that seems to be still actual:[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://malwaretips.com/threads/the-truth-about-windows-defender-on-windows-10-home-pro.88142/post-778119[/URL]Over the years I could change two things:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">The false positives rate of Microsoft Defender is one of the best, for several months (starting from the year 2021).</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Defender&#039;s detection is now slightly better (as compared to 3rd part AVs) than it was in the year 2018.</li>
</ul></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 994888, member: 32260"] I noticed such behavior on the low-resource computer when the machine was updating the system or Microsoft Store apps. But, after finishing the updates and .NET optimization, the machine is mostly usable (with an Intel Atom processor). The performance of Windows Defender (now Microsoft Defender) is well known and well tested. Some time ago I made a thread that seems to be still actual: [URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/the-truth-about-windows-defender-on-windows-10-home-pro.88142/post-778119[/URL] Over the years I could change two things: [LIST] [*]The false positives rate of Microsoft Defender is one of the best, for several months (starting from the year 2021). [*]The Defender's detection is now slightly better (as compared to 3rd part AVs) than it was in the year 2018. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification