Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Microsoft Defender- Hard to Explain
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1002201" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>It looks strange, but such unique and old samples are not dangerous in the wild.</p><p>They were really dangerous several months ago (for most AVs) when they were <em>never</em>-<em>before</em>-<em>seen</em> malware.</p><p>Although similar samples can be still found on a few websites with malware samples, they are used only in malware tests (not reused in real-life attacks).</p><p>The tests performed with a delay cannot show the real protection of the AVs. A significant part of the protection is only used to wean the attackers away from reusing the malware samples. Many AVs do it, so the attackers prefer to use new samples, because the older ones are not so efficient. Making a new sample takes a minute, many times quicker than finding the older samples missed by the AV.</p><p></p><p><strong>Currently, it would be interesting to test how AVs can protect against real-life attacks with modified Magniber MSI samples (delivered from compromised websites including archives, documents, scripts, etc.) without using any signatures. </strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1002201, member: 32260"] It looks strange, but such unique and old samples are not dangerous in the wild. They were really dangerous several months ago (for most AVs) when they were [I]never[/I]-[I]before[/I]-[I]seen[/I] malware. Although similar samples can be still found on a few websites with malware samples, they are used only in malware tests (not reused in real-life attacks). The tests performed with a delay cannot show the real protection of the AVs. A significant part of the protection is only used to wean the attackers away from reusing the malware samples. Many AVs do it, so the attackers prefer to use new samples, because the older ones are not so efficient. Making a new sample takes a minute, many times quicker than finding the older samples missed by the AV. [B]Currently, it would be interesting to test how AVs can protect against real-life attacks with modified Magniber MSI samples (delivered from compromised websites including archives, documents, scripts, etc.) without using any signatures. [/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top