Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1106968" data-attributes="member: 114717">In your use case, with your habits and knowledge, of course.However, for many they do not know the risks, how to calculate the risks, nor determine what their real security needs are.Simple is so much better than complex. More effective. More efficient. Easier for the hoomans to cope with and manage.&nbsp;Because of people, it is so easy to figure out the future of security. It will be 100% automated and run invisibly in the background. Future userlanders will not be involved in security. Ever. They will never have to exert a single brain cell in thinking about it or interacting with it. There will be no notifications. There will be no configuration settings. Plus they will have BMIs &gt; 40.Will that model ever work? Maybe. Depends upon the how capable the AI utilized is. But my instincts tell me that those future userlanders will do stuff that nullifies that AI-based security, just as users do to today&#039;s security. Any model that attempts to provide security while not directly involving the hooman by requiring them to have knowledge and disciplined adherence to certain behaviors will have weaknesses and vulnerabilities.Security is not software. Security is a process (that involves hoomans). Users are always the problem. Always.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1106968, member: 114717"] In your use case, with your habits and knowledge, of course. However, for many they do not know the risks, how to calculate the risks, nor determine what their real security needs are. Simple is so much better than complex. More effective. More efficient. Easier for the hoomans to cope with and manage. Because of people, it is so easy to figure out the future of security. It will be 100% automated and run invisibly in the background. Future userlanders will not be involved in security. Ever. They will never have to exert a single brain cell in thinking about it or interacting with it. There will be no notifications. There will be no configuration settings. Plus they will have BMIs > 40. Will that model ever work? Maybe. Depends upon the how capable the AI utilized is. But my instincts tell me that those future userlanders will do stuff that nullifies that AI-based security, just as users do to today's security. Any model that attempts to provide security while not directly involving the hooman by requiring them to have knowledge and disciplined adherence to certain behaviors will have weaknesses and vulnerabilities. Security is not software. Security is a process (that involves hoomans). Users are always the problem. Always. [/QUOTE]

Verification