Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
News
Security News
Microsoft Defender Is Not Enough Anymore—This Malware Gets Around It
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1109522" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p><strong>The article presents the wrong comparison method. It will always show that Microsoft Defender is not better than any AV. </strong></p><p>When seeking malware that can compromise MD and then testing that malware against another AV, MD will always get the 0% protection result, and another AV can randomly score better (and never worse).</p><p></p><p>We could get a similarly wrong result when seeking malware that can compromise a top AV and then testing that malware against MD. The top AV would always get the 0% protection result and MD could randomly score better (and never worse).</p><p>If SafetyDetectives did their tests correctly (preserving AV symmetry), they could see after many tests that the differences in protection between many popular AVs are very small.</p><p></p><p>Edit.</p><p>If we include Windows SmartScreen file reputation (assuming that the user respects its alerts), then the differences in protection between MD and top AVs are negligible for non-enterprise users.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1109522, member: 32260"] [B]The article presents the wrong comparison method. It will always show that Microsoft Defender is not better than any AV. [/B] When seeking malware that can compromise MD and then testing that malware against another AV, MD will always get the 0% protection result, and another AV can randomly score better (and never worse). We could get a similarly wrong result when seeking malware that can compromise a top AV and then testing that malware against MD. The top AV would always get the 0% protection result and MD could randomly score better (and never worse). If SafetyDetectives did their tests correctly (preserving AV symmetry), they could see after many tests that the differences in protection between many popular AVs are very small. Edit. If we include Windows SmartScreen file reputation (assuming that the user respects its alerts), then the differences in protection between MD and top AVs are negligible for non-enterprise users. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top