MSE + UAC + Windows Firewall is excellent protection.
When is the last time that anyone has seen any malware be able to bust through UAC? For example look at all of the Youtube videos where they test malware samples, they first allow it through UAC then when Windows File checker says the file is not digitally signed they still allow it to run anyway. So the user had to manually run the malware through two stages of protection in order to get infected. I really don't see the point if your AV didn't detect the sample when two separate protection stages did warn you about the file.
Malware can not function unless you allow it to get by UAC.
Everyone seems to forget that Microsoft does provide UAC which is the best protection you system can get.
So maybe some users don't pay attention and click allow on an infected file, that is not Microsoft's fault, that is their fault for not being aware.
Microsoft gives you the tools and even explains how to use them in detail, they are not responsible if you fail to utilize them correctly.
Thanks.
When is the last time that anyone has seen any malware be able to bust through UAC? For example look at all of the Youtube videos where they test malware samples, they first allow it through UAC then when Windows File checker says the file is not digitally signed they still allow it to run anyway. So the user had to manually run the malware through two stages of protection in order to get infected. I really don't see the point if your AV didn't detect the sample when two separate protection stages did warn you about the file.
Malware can not function unless you allow it to get by UAC.
Everyone seems to forget that Microsoft does provide UAC which is the best protection you system can get.
So maybe some users don't pay attention and click allow on an infected file, that is not Microsoft's fault, that is their fault for not being aware.
Microsoft gives you the tools and even explains how to use them in detail, they are not responsible if you fail to utilize them correctly.
Thanks.