Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Modern protection without signatures – comparison test on real threats (Advanced In The Wild Malware Test)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cruelsister" data-source="post: 977620" data-attributes="member: 7463"><p>Far too many of the popular tests mindlessly chose quantity over quality by testing various AM applications against vast numbers of malware samples (many of which could be essentially redundant) without actually running the samples in a test system (where VM naive systems are preferred, of course). Although a sugnature only based tests are amusing, they are hardly real world.</p><p></p><p>It is very nice to see a test that understands that the true measure of the effectiveness of anti-malware applications does not reside in signature based (dumb) detection. but instead will also emphasize the ability to prevent infections based on mechanism of action. </p><p></p><p>Dziękuję bardzo!</p><p></p><h2></h2></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cruelsister, post: 977620, member: 7463"] Far too many of the popular tests mindlessly chose quantity over quality by testing various AM applications against vast numbers of malware samples (many of which could be essentially redundant) without actually running the samples in a test system (where VM naive systems are preferred, of course). Although a sugnature only based tests are amusing, they are hardly real world. It is very nice to see a test that understands that the true measure of the effectiveness of anti-malware applications does not reside in signature based (dumb) detection. but instead will also emphasize the ability to prevent infections based on mechanism of action. Dziękuję bardzo! [HEADING=1][/HEADING] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
