Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Adrian Ścibor" data-source="post: 978310" data-attributes="member: 71496">Ok, thanks all commenters for interesting discussion!This sparked an effort to think about changing the methodology to keep MOTW and SmartScreen at the same time as enabled. I think a compromist was found to ensure that malware downloaded from the browser would have MOTW indicator and at the same time that the automatic malware launch routines would not display warning messages.Smart Screen technology is not that important because we are checking the AV program response anyway, and we want to bypass the other system messages. The most important thing is MOTW so that we do it better.We will test this internally and I will let you know what worked.Thank you, I am also learning new things because of you <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Adrian Ścibor, post: 978310, member: 71496"] [B]Ok, thanks all commenters for interesting discussion![/B] This sparked an effort to think about changing the methodology to keep MOTW and SmartScreen at the same time [B]as enabled[/B]. I think a compromist was found to ensure that malware downloaded from the browser would have [U]MOTW[/U] indicator and at the same time that the automatic malware launch routines would not display warning messages. Smart Screen technology is not that important because we are checking the AV program response anyway, and we want to bypass the other system messages. The most important thing is MOTW so that we do it better. We will test this internally and I will let you know what worked. Thank you, I am also learning new things because of you :) [/QUOTE]

Verification