Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
MRG Effitas 360 Assessment & certification Q2 2019
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 830341" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>Notes of this test:</p><p>- This is a test of Business/Small Office Products -> usually they use older engine than the one in Home version</p><p>- These products are usually a bit more advanced in settings but users have to make some changes to utilize the added options</p><p>- Their performance test is unreliable to me. They use some criteria that do not really affect everyday usage like Size on disk (some may consider this), installation time, Security software update and security software scanning to evaluate the products</p><p>- Small office AVs are usually heavier than Home AVs from the same company (I used Kaspersky small business and Kaspersky Endpoint Protection in the past. Performance Impact: Endpoint >>> Small Office >> Kaspersky Internet Security</p><p>Kaspersky small office was very buggy for me for unknown reasons. It used 1 version older than KIS</p><p></p><p>Where are: Copying speed, launching time of common apps (only firefox in their test), time of opening office files, pdfs, download speed, time of opening some websites and resource usage while doing these tasks???...</p><p>these matter</p><p></p><p>AV-comparatives is better on evaluating software performance</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 830341, member: 51905"] Notes of this test: - This is a test of Business/Small Office Products -> usually they use older engine than the one in Home version - These products are usually a bit more advanced in settings but users have to make some changes to utilize the added options - Their performance test is unreliable to me. They use some criteria that do not really affect everyday usage like Size on disk (some may consider this), installation time, Security software update and security software scanning to evaluate the products - Small office AVs are usually heavier than Home AVs from the same company (I used Kaspersky small business and Kaspersky Endpoint Protection in the past. Performance Impact: Endpoint >>> Small Office >> Kaspersky Internet Security Kaspersky small office was very buggy for me for unknown reasons. It used 1 version older than KIS Where are: Copying speed, launching time of common apps (only firefox in their test), time of opening office files, pdfs, download speed, time of opening some websites and resource usage while doing these tasks???... these matter AV-comparatives is better on evaluating software performance [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top