Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Game Of Thrones" data-source="post: 1104394" data-attributes="member: 23430">most antimalware scans local files once and then only scans new files so the impact will be minimal. only geeks scan the USB files, normal people just open the files or copy them and pass them to others, the point is with this on execution scan the chain of attack/infection will go on. As you see with Kaspersky or ESET it is possible to implement a balanced yet powerful policy of scanning and prevention which is still light on resources. with kinds like eset or Kaspersky, you don&#039;t need to worry about the performance of on access scan they made a balance by using local detections and cloud detections(hybrid detection which is the best policy and malware detection tactic) this on execution scan is not logical, malware should be taken care of ASAP, lying around on disk or network or USB devices is not rational. they wanted to make McAfee light but they messed up in this on execution thing</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Game Of Thrones, post: 1104394, member: 23430"] most antimalware scans local files once and then only scans new files so the impact will be minimal. only geeks scan the USB files, normal people just open the files or copy them and pass them to others, the point is with this on execution scan the chain of attack/infection will go on. As you see with Kaspersky or ESET it is possible to implement a balanced yet powerful policy of scanning and prevention which is still light on resources. with kinds like eset or Kaspersky, you don't need to worry about the performance of on access scan they made a balance by using local detections and cloud detections(hybrid detection which is the best policy and malware detection tactic) this on execution scan is not logical, malware should be taken care of ASAP, lying around on disk or network or USB devices is not rational. they wanted to make McAfee light but they messed up in this on execution thing [/QUOTE]

Verification