Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
NextDns vs ControlD DNS
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SohanRay" data-source="post: 1031449" data-attributes="member: 94632"><p>As dns0 has threat intel partners, I think even if NextDNS is tweaked, it would fall behind. Maybe you could perform the same test using NextDNS and ControlD? As far as I know both nextDNS and ControlD actually directly import from urlhause and phishtank. So the result should be very similar for both. Also, I tested from 2 sources which both of them definitely cannot import from directly like that, as that's impossible. I used Alienvault and IBM X-Force to get some malicious links manually and tested them with both of them. They both were very close in both cases. When used links from IBM, NextDNS did a little better and When used AlienVault, ControlD did a little better. It should also be taken into consideration that ControlD doesn't have AI yet(coming this month as mentioned in their blog) and NextDNS does. So, basically I am currently sticking with ControlD as they have customer support. They listen to their customers , their requests and info provided by them and take actions very quickly if needed. And their ad filter is maintained by them with aggressive blocking and false positives removed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SohanRay, post: 1031449, member: 94632"] As dns0 has threat intel partners, I think even if NextDNS is tweaked, it would fall behind. Maybe you could perform the same test using NextDNS and ControlD? As far as I know both nextDNS and ControlD actually directly import from urlhause and phishtank. So the result should be very similar for both. Also, I tested from 2 sources which both of them definitely cannot import from directly like that, as that's impossible. I used Alienvault and IBM X-Force to get some malicious links manually and tested them with both of them. They both were very close in both cases. When used links from IBM, NextDNS did a little better and When used AlienVault, ControlD did a little better. It should also be taken into consideration that ControlD doesn't have AI yet(coming this month as mentioned in their blog) and NextDNS does. So, basically I am currently sticking with ControlD as they have customer support. They listen to their customers , their requests and info provided by them and take actions very quickly if needed. And their ad filter is maintained by them with aggressive blocking and false positives removed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top