Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
NextDns vs ControlD DNS
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1036957"><p>When you have a lot of users and a lot of data entries and many data sets (blocklists), creating a blocklist per user is not an efficient approach. An alternative is to create a master (superset) with partition pointers for each blocklist that user has enabled. The data needed per user is simply a vector array containing pointers to the blocklist (partition) optimised for DNS filtering. Because this is all performance critical stuff it probably is not implemented using relational data bases, but low level displacement pointers. </p><p></p><p>When you disturb the chain of pointers, everything needs to be tested thoroughfully which is a lot of work for something that is only an optimization of disk space.Even when NextDNS did not want to change the mechanism of personal DNS blocklists, they could have simply removed them from the NextDNS my.nextdns.io management console (not removing in the blocklists from the block mechanism itself, but simply removing them as an option to choose). This simple UI-cleanup would not cost a lot of development manpower. </p><p></p><p>I agree it looks silly to offer blocklists which have not been updated for two years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1036957"] When you have a lot of users and a lot of data entries and many data sets (blocklists), creating a blocklist per user is not an efficient approach. An alternative is to create a master (superset) with partition pointers for each blocklist that user has enabled. The data needed per user is simply a vector array containing pointers to the blocklist (partition) optimised for DNS filtering. Because this is all performance critical stuff it probably is not implemented using relational data bases, but low level displacement pointers. When you disturb the chain of pointers, everything needs to be tested thoroughfully which is a lot of work for something that is only an optimization of disk space.Even when NextDNS did not want to change the mechanism of personal DNS blocklists, they could have simply removed them from the NextDNS my.nextdns.io management console (not removing in the blocklists from the block mechanism itself, but simply removing them as an option to choose). This simple UI-cleanup would not cost a lot of development manpower. I agree it looks silly to offer blocklists which have not been updated for two years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top