Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CyberDevil" data-source="post: 945501" data-attributes="member: 91290">I don&#039;t quite agree. I think that the main trend of recent years is the rise of Microsoft Defender, which is available to all users of the current Windows by default, as well as a general reduction in the number of active threats that can threaten a cautious (experienced) user. Therefore, I know dozens and dozens of people who do not understand why they need to pay for an antivirus. In my opinion, development additional services is correct, but it should be consistent, reasonable and of high quality. The most important direction is the creation of tools to increase privacy on the Internet, since information security a priori includes the concept of protecting personal data from uncontrolled leaks. However, most of the products provide additional services and not enough quality and for inadequate money. For example, Avast Anti-track is expensive and almost useless against the background of many free solutions, I believe that this functionality should have been included in Avast Premium by default.Nevertheless, Avira in my opinion is a living hell of a huge set of useless additional modules and this is an example of how you do not need to develop additional services within the framework of an antivirus product. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="CyberDevil, post: 945501, member: 91290"] I don't quite agree. I think that the main trend of recent years is the rise of Microsoft Defender, which is available to all users of the current Windows by default, as well as a general reduction in the number of active threats that can threaten a cautious (experienced) user. Therefore, I know dozens and dozens of people who do not understand why they need to pay for an antivirus. In my opinion, development additional services is correct, but it should be consistent, reasonable and of high quality. The most important direction is the creation of tools to increase privacy on the Internet, since information security a priori includes the concept of protecting personal data from uncontrolled leaks. However, most of the products provide additional services and not enough quality and for inadequate money. For example, Avast Anti-track is expensive and almost useless against the background of many free solutions, I believe that this functionality should have been included in Avast Premium by default. Nevertheless, Avira in my opinion is a living hell of a huge set of useless additional modules and this is an example of how you do not need to develop additional services within the framework of an antivirus product. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification