Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BVLon" data-source="post: 863814">NortonLifeLock will never become SDK-based.1.) NortonLifeLock is planning to launch an array of SERVICES that with or without Symantec WILL generate consistent cash float.2.) Norton has already signed a contract to have access to STAR, which is all they need.3.) Throughout the years, Symantec apart from spreading all the Norton funds across greedy managers, has not contributed one bit, with funds, patents or anything else towards Norton.4.) Symantec, now Broadcomm will be increasingly dependent on NortonLifeLock, as they have always been the most talented, stable and experienced team. Also, they are the only team that did not experience the huge turnover Symantec became known with. As Symantec will be looking to evolve, they can’t rely on their existing technology forever, no matter how good it is, maintaining a good relationship with NortonLifeLock will play a key role in keeping the company on par with the competition.5.) We don’t know how long will Broadcomm keep Symantec. We’ve seen hardware vendors make purchases before, only to spin the company off in a not-very-late stage.Norton is already executing fast enough. Their sales and market share have made a vast increase over the past few months. Their marketing division is getting strong again, the way it was before couple of Symantec 0-day managers decide they will trim it out of funds.They offer, and will keep offering, the right tools and services for users and in the future small businesses. This year NortonLifeLock will expand into mobile insurances as well. NortonLifeLock will progress to a company that is more known with services, rather then with software, which we all must agree, is the right tactic.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BVLon, post: 863814"] NortonLifeLock will never become SDK-based. 1.) NortonLifeLock is planning to launch an array of SERVICES that with or without Symantec WILL generate consistent cash float. 2.) Norton has already signed a contract to have access to STAR, which is all they need. 3.) Throughout the years, Symantec apart from spreading all the Norton funds across greedy managers, has not contributed one bit, with funds, patents or anything else towards Norton. 4.) Symantec, now Broadcomm will be increasingly dependent on NortonLifeLock, as they have always been the most talented, stable and experienced team. Also, they are the only team that did not experience the huge turnover Symantec became known with. As Symantec will be looking to evolve, they can’t rely on their existing technology forever, no matter how good it is, maintaining a good relationship with NortonLifeLock will play a key role in keeping the company on par with the competition. 5.) We don’t know how long will Broadcomm keep Symantec. We’ve seen hardware vendors make purchases before, only to spin the company off in a not-very-late stage. Norton is already executing fast enough. Their sales and market share have made a vast increase over the past few months. Their marketing division is getting strong again, the way it was before couple of Symantec 0-day managers decide they will trim it out of funds. They offer, and will keep offering, the right tools and services for users and in the future small businesses. This year NortonLifeLock will expand into mobile insurances as well. NortonLifeLock will progress to a company that is more known with services, rather then with software, which we all must agree, is the right tactic. [/QUOTE]

Verification