Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
NotPetya vs Comodo Firewall
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 649528" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Question for [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] or anyone else. You ran the test Partially Limited. So I have 2 scenarios->1. Admin acct and 2. Standard Limited rights acct.</p><p></p><p>1. Admin acct.-So Partial Limited in Admin account can create a startup entry or a scheduled task unless UAC is on? Could changes happen outside the container using this combination or is this known? I am guessing with UAC off program could create startups and scheduled tasks at this setting?</p><p>2. Standard Limited Rights acct-So in this type acct with UAC on, the same result? Container blocks everything designated for a UAC prompt? In this case I assume no task and no startup even with UAC off because of the limited rights nature of the account and Comodo container will auto-block rather than invoke UAC.</p><p></p><p>These are like c/s settings HIPS off. I like Safe Mode HIPS which can help see what an "Unrecognized" app wants to do. HIPS on, even if app in container set to Partially Limited in either type acct could create startup or task, I would get the HIPS alert about the attempt.</p><p></p><p>Curious how any of you would make your best description of what you think an application can do outside the container at Partially Limited. I am guessing at the Limited setting the container mimicks a Limited Rights acct but silently blocks each action which attempts to invoke UAC interaction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 649528, member: 32547"] Question for [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] or anyone else. You ran the test Partially Limited. So I have 2 scenarios->1. Admin acct and 2. Standard Limited rights acct. 1. Admin acct.-So Partial Limited in Admin account can create a startup entry or a scheduled task unless UAC is on? Could changes happen outside the container using this combination or is this known? I am guessing with UAC off program could create startups and scheduled tasks at this setting? 2. Standard Limited Rights acct-So in this type acct with UAC on, the same result? Container blocks everything designated for a UAC prompt? In this case I assume no task and no startup even with UAC off because of the limited rights nature of the account and Comodo container will auto-block rather than invoke UAC. These are like c/s settings HIPS off. I like Safe Mode HIPS which can help see what an "Unrecognized" app wants to do. HIPS on, even if app in container set to Partially Limited in either type acct could create startup or task, I would get the HIPS alert about the attempt. Curious how any of you would make your best description of what you think an application can do outside the container at Partially Limited. I am guessing at the Limited setting the container mimicks a Limited Rights acct but silently blocks each action which attempts to invoke UAC interaction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top