Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Windows_Security" data-source="post: 699812" data-attributes="member: 50782">EAM true behavioral blocker vs OS-Armor rules based execution monitor.EAM has a true behavioral blocker component, meaning that when a rule is trggered the process might not be blocked, but the next rule violation might. OS-Armor is more like a rules based HIPS. When one of its 60+ rules is triggered a process will be blocked, EAM vs OS_Armor = stacked rules versus single rules, so 1-0 for EAMEAM does look at a lot more atttack vectors than OS_Armor, so 2-0 for EAMEAM has more than a decade experience in False Positives fine tuning, so 3-0 for EAMSO I doubt whether OS Armor adds real protection to your setup (with EAM). When you use a free Anti-Virus without BB-component (e.g. like paid EAM) or rules based HIPS (e.g. like paid ESET), OS_Armor is a great free VALUABLE addition to your free setup.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Windows_Security, post: 699812, member: 50782"] [B] EAM true behavioral blocker vs OS-Armor rules based execution monitor.[/B] EAM has a true behavioral blocker component, meaning that when a rule is trggered the process might not be blocked, but the next rule violation might. OS-Armor is more like a rules based HIPS. When one of its 60+ rules is triggered a process will be blocked, EAM vs OS_Armor = stacked rules versus single rules, so 1-0 for EAM EAM does look at a lot more atttack vectors than OS_Armor, so 2-0 for EAM EAM has more than a decade experience in False Positives fine tuning, so 3-0 for EAM [B] SO I doubt whether OS Armor adds real protection to your setup (with EAM). When you use a free Anti-Virus without BB-component (e.g. like paid EAM) or rules based HIPS (e.g. like paid ESET), OS_Armor is a great free VALUABLE addition to your free setup.[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification