Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 703383" data-attributes="member: 32547">Question about the AppData protections.&nbsp; These come across to me as something that would be very helpful for a single system admin to have access to from the alert to create an exclusion.&nbsp; However, I realize that OSArmor can also be a great standard set of policies for networked standard user accounts, where any options should be impossible.&nbsp; For Andreas, I see how it must be important to keep that aspect of the program first in mind.&nbsp; However, is there a way to have a choice in configuration between home single system user, where user can make choices, or networked (either single user or network administrator), where choices are only available to the administrator?From there, I like @shmu&#039;s concept for medium/high/paranoid setting for a home single system user.&nbsp; Might make the initial choice simple.&nbsp; BTW, I was also considering whether adding a number near the system tray or something in red that could indicate unviewed blocks.&nbsp; Maybe this could be something of an option like with Voodoo Shield&#039;s shield so that users can know what&#039;s happening on the system.Really hope [USER=68429]@NoVirusThanks[/USER] yields good profits from OSArmor, and I would never like being considered someone who would attempt to advise a developer on what his best options for marketing his product may be .&nbsp; Yet I find that Binisoft doesn&#039;t get any complaints from its customers over its 5 PCs for $10 lifetime with Windows Firewall Control.&nbsp; Anyway, I feel like there can be lots of room for applications of this type, whether it&#039;s one PC or 5 or $5 or $15 (etc.), and that users would gratefully pay as soon as they are able to do so.&nbsp; No matter what OSA is off to a very good start, so I am looking forward to see where it goes.&nbsp; Good luck to Andreas and hope he is able to sort through the issues quickly without pressure.&nbsp; It must be hard to be a developer in the early stages of a good idea <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 703383, member: 32547"] Question about the AppData protections. These come across to me as something that would be very helpful for a single system admin to have access to from the alert to create an exclusion. However, I realize that OSArmor can also be a great standard set of policies for networked standard user accounts, where any options should be impossible. For Andreas, I see how it must be important to keep that aspect of the program first in mind. However, is there a way to have a choice in configuration between home single system user, where user can make choices, or networked (either single user or network administrator), where choices are only available to the administrator? From there, I like @shmu's concept for medium/high/paranoid setting for a home single system user. Might make the initial choice simple. BTW, I was also considering whether adding a number near the system tray or something in red that could indicate unviewed blocks. Maybe this could be something of an option like with Voodoo Shield's shield so that users can know what's happening on the system. Really hope [USER=68429]@NoVirusThanks[/USER] yields good profits from OSArmor, and I would never like being considered someone who would attempt to advise a developer on what his best options for marketing his product may be . Yet I find that Binisoft doesn't get any complaints from its customers over its 5 PCs for $10 lifetime with Windows Firewall Control. Anyway, I feel like there can be lots of room for applications of this type, whether it's one PC or 5 or $5 or $15 (etc.), and that users would gratefully pay as soon as they are able to do so. No matter what OSA is off to a very good start, so I am looking forward to see where it goes. Good luck to Andreas and hope he is able to sort through the issues quickly without pressure. It must be hard to be a developer in the early stages of a good idea :)... [/QUOTE]

Verification