Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Keller" data-source="post: 705923" data-attributes="member: 58132">I know this is not my decision but I just wanna mention, that this seems not to fit the goals of OSA. OSA want to be an additional layer of security independently from the AV you choose. ConfigureDefender helps configure windows settings which - at least most of them -&nbsp; only make sense if you choose WD as you main AV solution. So, the scope of ConfigureDefender is not the same as OSA.If you wanna use WD as your main AV ConfigureDefender is great and I recommend to use it in addition to Hardconfigurator which is also developed by [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] .As it seems for now OSA could be added to this configuration as well...Just my two cents...<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Daniel Keller, post: 705923, member: 58132"] I know this is not my decision but I just wanna mention, that this seems not to fit the goals of OSA. OSA want to be an additional layer of security independently from the AV you choose. ConfigureDefender helps configure windows settings which - at least most of them - only make sense if you choose WD as you main AV solution. So, the scope of ConfigureDefender is not the same as OSA. If you wanna use WD as your main AV ConfigureDefender is great and I recommend to use it in addition to Hardconfigurator which is also developed by [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] . As it seems for now OSA could be added to this configuration as well... Just my two cents...;) [/QUOTE]

Verification