Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
NoVirusThanks OSArmor
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 65228" data-source="post: 710525"><p>Actually OSArmor and VoodooShield more or less work the same in terms of accomplishing the core functionality to do what they need to do. They use a kernel-mode callback and send the data back to the user-mode service which returns the response. The main difference is the purpose both are intended for, one being meant as an anti-executable and the other doing buffer comparisons for the command line details to decide to block/allow - and given VoodooShield has other things like "Ai" scanning then it'll have it's stuff for all that as well of course.</p><p></p><p>NVT EXE Radar is quite mature as well and relies on the same underlying technology for process interception.</p><p></p><p>OSArmor is stable, but depending on the configuration it might not be convenient.</p><p></p><p>It's true OSArmor is less tested against malware but if you meant in general then I don't agree because OSArmor is pretty much using EXE Radar technology which is well-tested.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 65228, post: 710525"] Actually OSArmor and VoodooShield more or less work the same in terms of accomplishing the core functionality to do what they need to do. They use a kernel-mode callback and send the data back to the user-mode service which returns the response. The main difference is the purpose both are intended for, one being meant as an anti-executable and the other doing buffer comparisons for the command line details to decide to block/allow - and given VoodooShield has other things like "Ai" scanning then it'll have it's stuff for all that as well of course. NVT EXE Radar is quite mature as well and relies on the same underlying technology for process interception. OSArmor is stable, but depending on the configuration it might not be convenient. It's true OSArmor is less tested against malware but if you meant in general then I don't agree because OSArmor is pretty much using EXE Radar technology which is well-tested. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top