Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 733273" data-attributes="member: 32547">Digging a little bit deeper about NVT OSArmor.&nbsp; The video showing UAC protections on Windows 7 caused me to be curious if UAC and other areas of Windows that OSA protects should be classified as &quot;unpatched&quot; vulnerabilities.&nbsp; I would love to hear any input on this, not that I am looking for a reason to complain about MS.&nbsp; Attempting to classify OSA I think...<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite119" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />&nbsp; Having a hard time knowing how to classify the scope of the protections and also gauging a best configuration for the program.I &quot;think&quot; OSArmor really could block many potential vulnerabilities too that aren&#039;t even known.&nbsp; Not sure about this however...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 733273, member: 32547"] Digging a little bit deeper about NVT OSArmor. The video showing UAC protections on Windows 7 caused me to be curious if UAC and other areas of Windows that OSA protects should be classified as "unpatched" vulnerabilities. I would love to hear any input on this, not that I am looking for a reason to complain about MS. Attempting to classify OSA I think...:rolleyes: Having a hard time knowing how to classify the scope of the protections and also gauging a best configuration for the program. I "think" OSArmor really could block many potential vulnerabilities too that aren't even known. Not sure about this however... [/QUOTE]

Verification