Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0 Days, and ESET (Part 2)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="czesetfan" data-source="post: 1084066" data-attributes="member: 93724"><p>ESET is known for striving for balance: detection/FP, performance, user-friendliness. </p><p>That's why I think they will default to a "sure" setting that doesn't generate FP and customer support queries. On the other hand, the wide options of advanced settings allow to individually block single and more specific attack paths.</p><p></p><p>I would like the ability to set clickable "levels/modes" of protection: for example - basic, medium, hard. Where selecting it would harden the predefined settings of the individual software components - HIPS, firewall, etc. And in "hard" such behavior would be blocked on the firewall for example. This could generate trouble/FP, but that would be expected in "hard" mode.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="czesetfan, post: 1084066, member: 93724"] ESET is known for striving for balance: detection/FP, performance, user-friendliness. That's why I think they will default to a "sure" setting that doesn't generate FP and customer support queries. On the other hand, the wide options of advanced settings allow to individually block single and more specific attack paths. I would like the ability to set clickable "levels/modes" of protection: for example - basic, medium, hard. Where selecting it would harden the predefined settings of the individual software components - HIPS, firewall, etc. And in "hard" such behavior would be blocked on the firewall for example. This could generate trouble/FP, but that would be expected in "hard" mode. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top