Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0 Days, and ESET (Part 2)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Practical Response" data-source="post: 1084093" data-attributes="member: 109138"><p>The was no malicious item in the first video, just a demo of the file bypass which of course worked because the product does not block these as they can be used for good or bad, and already explained its a security tool. Route of infection is very important for a product to work as designed. Notice I'm not putting emphasis on any particular product right now. The second video same demonstration of a modified to drop a infection but again, route of infection was not displayed. The product was not given a chance regardless if it could stop the infection or not. </p><p></p><p>Your first sentence said it all, real world testing almost all Avs score well, because guess what, they use route of infection testing. </p><p></p><p>As for [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] this comes with no offense meant but because he threw you out there like this I have no choice but to comment. </p><p></p><p>This user tests URLS and files from a folder on a desktop, not true route of infection testing just like has been done here. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Your honor, I have nothing further to state to the jury, all facts have been presented.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Practical Response, post: 1084093, member: 109138"] The was no malicious item in the first video, just a demo of the file bypass which of course worked because the product does not block these as they can be used for good or bad, and already explained its a security tool. Route of infection is very important for a product to work as designed. Notice I'm not putting emphasis on any particular product right now. The second video same demonstration of a modified to drop a infection but again, route of infection was not displayed. The product was not given a chance regardless if it could stop the infection or not. Your first sentence said it all, real world testing almost all Avs score well, because guess what, they use route of infection testing. As for [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] this comes with no offense meant but because he threw you out there like this I have no choice but to comment. This user tests URLS and files from a folder on a desktop, not true route of infection testing just like has been done here. Your honor, I have nothing further to state to the jury, all facts have been presented. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top