Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0-Days, ESET, and Microsoft Defender
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1083270" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>The AV vendors already decided that they should detect some legal applications or restrict some LOLBins, just because they could be <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">possibly</span></strong> used for something malicious. If you ask them, you can get the answer that it is necessary to provide sufficient protection. The fact that You or I might not like the answer will not change anything. Such practice is forced by the attackers who use the attack methods that abuse legal resources and AV vendors cannot find a better way.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p><p>The last sentence in the video can be questionable without additional comment, but I think that the author of this thread made it clear in her last post: "No bashing of E was done or intended, just information for those that use and like ESET." I hope that the (slightly too long) discussion in this thread helped readers to avoid misunderstanding the test results.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1083270, member: 32260"] The AV vendors already decided that they should detect some legal applications or restrict some LOLBins, just because they could be [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]possibly[/COLOR][/B] used for something malicious. If you ask them, you can get the answer that it is necessary to provide sufficient protection. The fact that You or I might not like the answer will not change anything. Such practice is forced by the attackers who use the attack methods that abuse legal resources and AV vendors cannot find a better way. Agreed. The last sentence in the video can be questionable without additional comment, but I think that the author of this thread made it clear in her last post: "No bashing of E was done or intended, just information for those that use and like ESET." I hope that the (slightly too long) discussion in this thread helped readers to avoid misunderstanding the test results. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top