Old Software is it ever safe to use?
Share practical recommendations that address the author's needs.
I think that it depends on the software and the reputation of both it and its creator/vendor. I'll use ShadowDefender as an example here, the linked MT thread indicates users views on this software and the difference between how it has been maintained (the need for updating it) and the way that its website has been.
malwaretips.com
Is Shadow Defender officially dead now? | MalwareTips
Some time ago I saw someone on MalwareTips saying that Shadow Defender got a new update. I think it was 1.5 as far as i remember. I still had 1.4 and...
malwaretips.com
F
ForgottenSeer 85179
At worst (and most case) you can get infected by such software.
Only with AppContainer apps this isn't a problem yet.
I recommend Windows Sandbox / using Hyper-V.
Sandboxie is a security desaster:
NVD - Home
The obvious answer ill be old software is must less safe. But it doesn't work like that, depends on the developer of the software.
Some software developers concentrated in resolving bugs and security issues other just in the bugs of their software, so it's not a linear thing.
So, my recommendations its update the software if you can, but if some old software its real necessary why not.
Install a good security solution, it will help to mitigate the lack of updates of some software.
For example, until a month ago I use Rocketdock, it's a software that don't have support since 2007, but I really like that dock now I have replaced for nexus dock.
Sandboxie 5.26 is a very old version, it's been revised a number of times since then.
Current Plus and Classic versions are 0.7.4 and 5.49.7 respectively. The current developer acknowledged there were glaring vulnerabilities and he fixed them. I use his software now without qualms.
Sandboxie Technologies (SBIE Open source) (VERSION 5.33.6 ONLY!)
And for "conservative" users of Sandboxie (like me) it would be of interest to learn if Bo's and Special's critical remarks (= possible opening of new...
www.wilderssecurity.com
I should have maybe been more specific I use Sandboxie Plus which is updated reguarly.Sandboxie is a security desaster:
NVD - Home
nvd.nist.gov
Lol you should have said security-nightmare at least that would have matched your name.
F
ForgottenSeer 85179
That's not the point. The point is that user trust such software and if it use insecure stuff like that, it cant be trusted at all.
This isn't a simple bug, it's an fatal design error.
I am interested in updating the files that are called and used, such as .dll.
My pc has a mix of different versions of .dll and .exe related to FFmpeg.
I recently read a topic about FFmpeg being updated. In this case, should I replace all the files with the latest ones?
My pc has a mix of different versions of .dll and .exe related to FFmpeg.
I recently read a topic about FFmpeg being updated. In this case, should I replace all the files with the latest ones?
Did you happen to read what the developer said in my Wilders link in post #7? What "insecure stuff" are you referring to? He fixed these vulnerabilities, he rebuilt a lot of SBIE code from scratch since it went open-source. There are several independent testers involved, he's not just throwing SBIE out there and saying: "It's safe, trust me." He has 22 contributors to his Sandboxie project alone,: check it out on his GitHub page.
If a security software is found to have "fatal design errors," I'll be among the first to discontinue its use. But one has to show me solid documentation. The developer is collaborating with independent testers since over a year already, like this one. I haven't heard of any recent Sandboxie bugs but you know something? HitmanPro got a patch to its kernel driver very recently. OMG a bug!
Hitman Pro Support and Discussion Thread
We're currently having Trojan.FakeAV remnant detections in combination with Bitdefender and/or Trend Micro setups. We are working on solving these...
www.wilderssecurity.com
OK, so some don't like Sandboxie, that's fine. BUT, give me proof of CURRENT issues! That's all I ask.
If it's an old web browser not being developed and updated, then no way in my books would it be safe to use. Otherwise if it's some obscure utility for example, then it's probably safe to use. I think it really comes down to what hackers are targeting.
If you are sure that the software is discontinued, just block the "old software" from connecting to the internet with a firewall, and let it run locally.
My preference would be for softwares that is maintained by their respective developers, unless the software that you are dealing with has no good alternative. Unless the software that you are using are critical to be updated, i.e browsers, password managers, antivirus etc, you are fairly safe.
My preference would be for softwares that is maintained by their respective developers, unless the software that you are dealing with has no good alternative. Unless the software that you are using are critical to be updated, i.e browsers, password managers, antivirus etc, you are fairly safe.
Except situation when outdated is firewall?
I'm still using XP with Kerio 2.1.5 from 2004
I admire you for still using XP in this era, when support for Vista, Win 7 and Win 8 ended a good while back. If it's system resources that prevents you from updating, I got one word for you, "Linux".Except situation when outdated is firewall?
Recently browsing
Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes
You may also like...
- T
-
Serious Discussion Getting Started in Ethical Hacking
-
-
MalwareTips News Malware script uses a comment to sidetrack AI code scanners -
