Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1031337">[USER=71262]@oldschool[/USER] thanks for your feedback, I changed my mode to litlle lies mode using some oy your settings.&nbsp; I tried how good the FingerPrintDetector is with Javascript Shield OFF and it seems to work OK, without the feedback of the wrappers. Therefore I am running it with JavaShield OFF and a custom level protection called &quot;Little lies mode&quot; for websites with medium risk of fingerprinting and i Use &quot;Recommended mode&quot; for high risk of fingerprinting. This seems (for me) the best balance for no website breakage with protection.I had a look on JShelter related threads on MT and on Github and can&#039;t really understand why Kees1958 was so critical against the authors. For what I understand of the issues on github, they implemented most of critic (only not data base with video cards like Trace and paid version of Cydec Anti_Fingerprinting). The authors even started an evaluation of their protection mechanisms after his critism (see spolier), so I don&#039;t understand why Kees1958 stayed so critical in his responses on github and MT.[SPOILER=&quot;Research effectiveness by JShelter&quot;][ATTACH=full]273724[/ATTACH][/SPOILER]<h3></h3></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1031337"] [USER=71262]@oldschool[/USER] thanks for your feedback, I changed my mode to litlle lies mode using some oy your settings. I tried how good the FingerPrintDetector is with Javascript Shield OFF and it seems to work OK, without the feedback of the wrappers. Therefore I am running it with JavaShield OFF and a custom level protection called "Little lies mode" for websites with medium risk of fingerprinting and i Use "Recommended mode" for high risk of fingerprinting. This seems (for me) the best balance for no website breakage with protection. I had a look on JShelter related threads on MT and on Github and can't really understand why Kees1958 was so critical against the authors. For what I understand of the issues on github, they implemented most of critic (only not data base with video cards like Trace and paid version of Cydec Anti_Fingerprinting). The authors even started an evaluation of their protection mechanisms after his critism (see spolier), so I don't understand why Kees1958 stayed so critical in his responses on github and MT. [SPOILER="Research effectiveness by JShelter"] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1679216309229.png"]273724[/ATTACH] [/SPOILER] [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [/QUOTE]

Verification