Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 823865" data-source="post: 838372">No, VS doesn&#039;t have true anti-exploit capabilities, this is just marketing gimmick like many vendors does to boost sales. However, it has anti-post-exploit capabilities. to be qualified as a true anti-exploit, one must be able to protect the memory space. VS like other anti-exes don&#039;t have this feature.Anyway VS and anti-exe arent supposed to block exploit, it isn&#039;t their scope, they still works well with Win10 Exploit Guard or other anti-exploits like MBAE and HMPA.I never used BD, but if it has real anti-exploit capabilities, then you dont need MBAE or HMPA. If it has i would avoid adding MBAE to avoid potential conflicts.if you use MBAE (must be without BDIS) then yes, you can use SH or HC (better H_C than SH btw).i rather use this combo than BDIS:&nbsp; Windows Defender + MBAE/MBAM + H_C.yes and no. Yes because it has its reputation querry feature and no if you learn how to tweak BDIS. btw, dont use the free version, it is useless, no access to settings, you my ask its dev for a testing license, he used to offer many to forum members.HIPS are superior to any anti-exe, they monitor more stuff like dlls, drivers, etc...i was a big fan of Comodo back in the days of v5-6, if you learn how to use it, you wont need anything else. I used to use it heavily tweaked and in paranoid mode. Cruelsister config is ok for new users but it is not the maximum protection you can get since she relies a lot on the sandbox and not on the HIPS (which was Comodo main value)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 823865, post: 838372"] No, VS doesn't have [B][U]true [/U][/B]anti-exploit capabilities, this is just marketing gimmick like many vendors does to boost sales. However, it has [U][B]anti-post-exploit[/B][/U] capabilities. to be qualified as a true anti-exploit, one must be able to protect the memory space. VS like other anti-exes don't have this feature. Anyway VS and anti-exe arent supposed to block exploit, it isn't their scope, they still works well with Win10 Exploit Guard or other anti-exploits like MBAE and HMPA. I never used BD, but if it has real anti-exploit capabilities, then you dont need MBAE or HMPA. If it has i would avoid adding MBAE to avoid potential conflicts. if you use MBAE (must be without BDIS) then yes, you can use SH or HC (better H_C than SH btw). i rather use this combo than BDIS: Windows Defender + MBAE/MBAM + H_C. yes and no. Yes because it has its reputation querry feature and no if you learn how to tweak BDIS. btw, dont use the free version, it is useless, no access to settings, you my ask its dev for a testing license, he used to offer many to forum members. HIPS are superior to any anti-exe, they monitor more stuff like dlls, drivers, etc...i was a big fan of Comodo back in the days of v5-6, if you learn how to use it, you wont need anything else. I used to use it heavily tweaked and in paranoid mode. Cruelsister config is ok for new users but it is not the maximum protection you can get since she relies a lot on the sandbox and not on the HIPS (which was Comodo main value) [/QUOTE]

Verification