Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
Osprey Browser Protection discussion and updates
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marko :)" data-source="post: 1124019" data-attributes="member: 39702"><p>That might not be ideal. Sure, it could work for phishing websites, but those malicious ones... I wouldn't rely on Osprey to block those. Hackers can easily make malicious scripts to load first and massively increase chances of executing script before Osprey reacts.</p><p></p><p>There is a solution for this, but this would require [USER=121741]@Foulest[/USER] to have a server which would cache all the URL requests. Instead of sending multiple requests to security providers, it would only make one requests to Foulest's server which would then forward URLs to security providers and then return the result. Otherwise, it's either no delay and less protection, or more delay and better protection.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marko :), post: 1124019, member: 39702"] That might not be ideal. Sure, it could work for phishing websites, but those malicious ones... I wouldn't rely on Osprey to block those. Hackers can easily make malicious scripts to load first and massively increase chances of executing script before Osprey reacts. There is a solution for this, but this would require [USER=121741]@Foulest[/USER] to have a server which would cache all the URL requests. Instead of sending multiple requests to security providers, it would only make one requests to Foulest's server which would then forward URLs to security providers and then return the result. Otherwise, it's either no delay and less protection, or more delay and better protection. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
