Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Performance Test October 2019
Message
<blockquote data-quote="polishpatriot" data-source="post: 858699" data-attributes="member: 85707"><p>I see the non-cache delay when opening folders with lots of files - such as pCloud or OneDrive.</p><p></p><p>To me it, it is based upon observation. It can be said to be anecdotal evidence. Some users seem to have a lot more problem with it than others.</p><p></p><p>I am pretty sure WD does not use the equivalent of iSwift and iChecker technologies (Kaspersky). WD is using 2010 technology and methods. And like I pointed out indirectly, Microsoft subcontracts a lot of Windows Defender out to India and Eastern Euro shops. Those shops can only do what Microsoft specifies in the contracts. Otherwise I'm sure that those shops would make WD a better product.</p><p></p><p>I think MS deliberately leaves the "large folder" delay in W10 just to annoy power-users. Average home user doesn't have 250+ object-stuffed folders and drives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="polishpatriot, post: 858699, member: 85707"] I see the non-cache delay when opening folders with lots of files - such as pCloud or OneDrive. To me it, it is based upon observation. It can be said to be anecdotal evidence. Some users seem to have a lot more problem with it than others. I am pretty sure WD does not use the equivalent of iSwift and iChecker technologies (Kaspersky). WD is using 2010 technology and methods. And like I pointed out indirectly, Microsoft subcontracts a lot of Windows Defender out to India and Eastern Euro shops. Those shops can only do what Microsoft specifies in the contracts. Otherwise I'm sure that those shops would make WD a better product. I think MS deliberately leaves the "large folder" delay in W10 just to annoy power-users. Average home user doesn't have 250+ object-stuffed folders and drives. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
