Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
General Apps
VPN and DNS
Phishing Protection — Comparing DNS Security Filters
Message
<blockquote data-quote="509322" data-source="post: 771962"><p>That is just some number you came up with and it isn't accurate.</p><p></p><p>If you don't visit porn, then you don't have to filter for porn. A solution so simple that it is brilliant and orders of magnitude more effective than using multi-layered web content filtering.</p><p></p><p>I do a lot of really high risk surfing as part of my job, and I can tell you from firsthand experience that web content filtering adds next to nothing to overall protections.</p><p></p><p>Web content filtering is more important to the person's psychological state than to any really significant layer of protection.</p><p></p><p>People on the forums promote web content filtering but they don't know what they're talking about. That's what I am pointing out.</p><p></p><p>The worst are those that think somehow they will visit a website like MalwareTips, click on something, and then get re-directed to some webpage that looks like MT that unknowingly downloads and installs stuff in the background that will smash their system. There are so multiple layers of misunderstanding in such thinking.</p><p></p><p>Web content filtering is more likely to allow you to infect yourself than to save you. It's just not very effective. It is known for high false negatives. The disadvantages are numerous and high.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="509322, post: 771962"] That is just some number you came up with and it isn't accurate. If you don't visit porn, then you don't have to filter for porn. A solution so simple that it is brilliant and orders of magnitude more effective than using multi-layered web content filtering. I do a lot of really high risk surfing as part of my job, and I can tell you from firsthand experience that web content filtering adds next to nothing to overall protections. Web content filtering is more important to the person's psychological state than to any really significant layer of protection. People on the forums promote web content filtering but they don't know what they're talking about. That's what I am pointing out. The worst are those that think somehow they will visit a website like MalwareTips, click on something, and then get re-directed to some webpage that looks like MT that unknowingly downloads and installs stuff in the background that will smash their system. There are so multiple layers of misunderstanding in such thinking. Web content filtering is more likely to allow you to infect yourself than to save you. It's just not very effective. It is known for high false negatives. The disadvantages are numerous and high. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top