Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
Planned: Real-world Test of Trend Micro, ZoneAlarm, Eset and Webroot
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 114834" data-source="post: 1097368"><p>You keep saying I'm claiming products like webroot and trend your full of crap, pull up the post then where I stated that, because all I said was make sure to test as designed. The product I mentioned needs time to monitor unknowns and this can take hours, not something you can do in a 5-10 minute test. One reason it was not tested often around here. Other products do this as well, you know this, they can make verdicts later, and if they protect the system and information in the process of determining them the product did not fail. </p><p></p><p>Of course if you want to act all professional for the people you could break out wireshark, capture packets and prove through TCP streams " you may need to decode them" that these products are not actually sending information " like emails and passwords ect," out due to restrictions regardless of the perceived traffic via other tools, correct? </p><p></p><p>I mean common, your a professional show us a real test. Prove these products are truly failing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 114834, post: 1097368"] You keep saying I'm claiming products like webroot and trend your full of crap, pull up the post then where I stated that, because all I said was make sure to test as designed. The product I mentioned needs time to monitor unknowns and this can take hours, not something you can do in a 5-10 minute test. One reason it was not tested often around here. Other products do this as well, you know this, they can make verdicts later, and if they protect the system and information in the process of determining them the product did not fail. Of course if you want to act all professional for the people you could break out wireshark, capture packets and prove through TCP streams " you may need to decode them" that these products are not actually sending information " like emails and passwords ect," out due to restrictions regardless of the perceived traffic via other tools, correct? I mean common, your a professional show us a real test. Prove these products are truly failing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top