Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
Planned: Real-world Test of Trend Micro, ZoneAlarm, Eset and Webroot
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 114834" data-source="post: 1097396"><p>So what's all the fuss about if you have agreed with the initial assessment I placed forth? </p><p></p><p>I stated you should test the products abilities as designed. If it has advanced features that are disabled, you should enable them. Eset HIPS can be trained quickly in learning mode if you have very little in the test machine and then placed in smart mode which is kind of like interactive mode with minimal interaction. </p><p></p><p>These "tools" are designed to be used by those that understand the operating system and advanced settings of the product. Just because a handful of users here do not understand them or use them does not mean they are not utilized, most likely not by home users, but then again I know very few users here in the US using eset at home. They would look at the settings and be like " nope" of course they would understand it's not designed for users like them, ironic isn't it. </p><p></p><p>If you do not wish to use these features in a test, that's fine too, you just can't claim a product failed if you do not allow the product to utilize all its abilities to defend. This latter part is not rocket science.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 114834, post: 1097396"] So what's all the fuss about if you have agreed with the initial assessment I placed forth? I stated you should test the products abilities as designed. If it has advanced features that are disabled, you should enable them. Eset HIPS can be trained quickly in learning mode if you have very little in the test machine and then placed in smart mode which is kind of like interactive mode with minimal interaction. These "tools" are designed to be used by those that understand the operating system and advanced settings of the product. Just because a handful of users here do not understand them or use them does not mean they are not utilized, most likely not by home users, but then again I know very few users here in the US using eset at home. They would look at the settings and be like " nope" of course they would understand it's not designed for users like them, ironic isn't it. If you do not wish to use these features in a test, that's fine too, you just can't claim a product failed if you do not allow the product to utilize all its abilities to defend. This latter part is not rocket science. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top