Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Playing with UAC
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 1079652" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>I have personally witnessed thousands of “Yes” UAC end-user clicks since it was released with Windows Vista in 2007, and not a SINGLE “No” end-user click. I remember how excited I was when Microsoft announced UAC in 2006, and was hoping it would drastically reduce malware infections, but was highly disappointed when I experienced the implementation first hand. A lot of people do not know this, but my disappointment in Microsoft’s implementation of UAC was a huge reason VoodooShield was created in the first place.</p><p></p><p>The main issue with UAC is that it requires the end-user to make a binary decision on the spot, and even worse, the UAC affirmative user prompt provides little or no file insight or user recommendation to the end-user so they can make an informed decision. The end result is that the end-user almost always simply clicks "Yes".</p><p></p><p>[USER=99014]@Trident[/USER] is not wrong when he says “Asking the user what should be done in terms of security is a concept that is not preferred”. But at the same time, allow-by-default guarantees breaches and infections will only continue. There has to be a happy medium, we just have to find it.</p><p></p><p>In short, this is the principal problem that we have been working on for over a decade, and are open to suggestions for usability improvements, especially from those who have not tried CyberLock first hand. We have fixed the major issues with UAC, but there is always room for improvement, especially when it comes to usability.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 1079652, member: 62850"] I have personally witnessed thousands of “Yes” UAC end-user clicks since it was released with Windows Vista in 2007, and not a SINGLE “No” end-user click. I remember how excited I was when Microsoft announced UAC in 2006, and was hoping it would drastically reduce malware infections, but was highly disappointed when I experienced the implementation first hand. A lot of people do not know this, but my disappointment in Microsoft’s implementation of UAC was a huge reason VoodooShield was created in the first place. The main issue with UAC is that it requires the end-user to make a binary decision on the spot, and even worse, the UAC affirmative user prompt provides little or no file insight or user recommendation to the end-user so they can make an informed decision. The end result is that the end-user almost always simply clicks "Yes". [USER=99014]@Trident[/USER] is not wrong when he says “Asking the user what should be done in terms of security is a concept that is not preferred”. But at the same time, allow-by-default guarantees breaches and infections will only continue. There has to be a happy medium, we just have to find it. In short, this is the principal problem that we have been working on for over a decade, and are open to suggestions for usability improvements, especially from those who have not tried CyberLock first hand. We have fixed the major issues with UAC, but there is always room for improvement, especially when it comes to usability. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top