Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
[Privacy-Blockers] - Application / OS / Lists
Message
<blockquote data-quote="valvaris" data-source="post: 852122" data-attributes="member: 38787"><p>I am a simple person but still I like a challenge.</p><p></p><p>What is this about?</p><p>I already approached Pi-Hole and they seem not to be interested to combine efforts with the dev.-team of eBlocker. </p><p></p><p>So what?</p><p>The idea behind it is to have eblocker do the pattern blocking and Pi-Hole the the recursive DNSSEC with the extension unbound.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/unbound/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>What does that mean?</p><p>eBlocker has HTTPs inspection and pattern files that look inside packet for things that match. Pi-Hole can secure your DNS query and be the first point of contact. For the DNSSec chain...</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]231686[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Is it not redundant?</p><p>It is not because eBlocker only supports Uplink DNS - So we use this to our advantage and forward that to the Pi-Hole -> That does a recursive DNSSec query and accepts trusted responses from the Root-DNS-Servers. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>What should that accomplish?</p><p>Mainly getting rid of Uplink DNS Servers (Never know who to trust!) - Plus traffic can be intercepted since it uses old DNS Protocol (eblocker) </p><p></p><p>Feedback will come in soon - My new Raspberry Pi 4 is incoming. ^^</p><p></p><p>Best regards</p><p>Val.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="valvaris, post: 852122, member: 38787"] I am a simple person but still I like a challenge. What is this about? I already approached Pi-Hole and they seem not to be interested to combine efforts with the dev.-team of eBlocker. So what? The idea behind it is to have eblocker do the pattern blocking and Pi-Hole the the recursive DNSSEC with the extension unbound. [URL unfurl="true"]https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/unbound/[/URL] What does that mean? eBlocker has HTTPs inspection and pattern files that look inside packet for things that match. Pi-Hole can secure your DNS query and be the first point of contact. For the DNSSec chain... [ATTACH type="full" width="280px"]231686[/ATTACH] Is it not redundant? It is not because eBlocker only supports Uplink DNS - So we use this to our advantage and forward that to the Pi-Hole -> That does a recursive DNSSec query and accepts trusted responses from the Root-DNS-Servers. :) What should that accomplish? Mainly getting rid of Uplink DNS Servers (Never know who to trust!) - Plus traffic can be intercepted since it uses old DNS Protocol (eblocker) Feedback will come in soon - My new Raspberry Pi 4 is incoming. ^^ Best regards Val. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top