Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1098152" data-attributes="member: 32260">The scorings displayed on the AVLab website differ in these two cases from the information included in the .csv files. So, someone used the correct testing information for scorings and statistics but attached the wrong .csv files.For the May 2024, test the .csv file is named &quot;report-summary-march-2024.csv&quot; and binary equal to the .csv file taken from the March 2024 test.For September 2022 the file name is OK (&quot;september-2022.csv&quot;), but it is simply renamed file &quot;july-2022.csv&quot; taken from the July test.Edit.I used the hashes included in the .csv files to get information from VirusTotal about the infection rate of digitally signed files (valid, fake, malformed) compared to unsigned files. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1098152, member: 32260"] The scorings displayed on the AVLab website differ in these two cases from the information included in the .csv files. So, someone used the correct testing information for scorings and statistics but attached the wrong .csv files. For the May 2024, test the .csv file is named "report-summary-march-2024.csv" and binary equal to the .csv file taken from the March 2024 test. For September 2022 the file name is OK ("september-2022.csv"), but it is simply renamed file "july-2022.csv" taken from the July test. Edit. I used the hashes included in the .csv files to get information from VirusTotal about the infection rate of digitally signed files (valid, fake, malformed) compared to unsigned files. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification