Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 1088010" data-attributes="member: 32547">&quot;AI&quot; is the product of a human being, not a human being itself, nor capable of any action of its own right or origin.&nbsp; The human behind the program is responsible for the actions of the computer hosting the program he writes if there is negligence in the program&#039;s creation.&nbsp; &quot;AI&quot; cannot possibly bring success, because human intelligence is always greater.So if a human writes a program and profits from the sale of the program, the human is culpable as a business owner (owner of the product rights) for any illegal activity associated with the program itself, which can be attributed to negligence.&nbsp; This could possibly even include illegal activity that is intentionally initiated by a purchaser of the [unaltered] software, if the purchaser intended to engage in illegal activity.&nbsp; If the human writes the program for his own use, and the computer(s) running the program is found to be associated with criminally illegal activity under the law, the human who wrote the program is criminally liable and possibly civilly in the form of a lawsuit.&nbsp; In any case, the creator of a product is responsible for creating a product which could never be used to commit an illegal action or even could be randomly associated to someone by illegal activity.&nbsp; The law goes to great lengths to eliminate the dangers of products through regulations for use or ownership of a product or by requiring instructions for use and warning labels.&nbsp; These requirements should, ideally, protect all from misdeeds.&nbsp; If not, then there are legalities to address with the product.&quot;AI&quot; is malware, honestly.&nbsp; It is malware in the sense that it is a bad idea.&nbsp; That said, a program that could generate temporarily a small program guaranteed to function within the boundaries of the law would be fine, so long as the host program cannot be associated with illegal activity.&nbsp; It is an insult to intelligence to intimate that &quot;AI&quot; is intelligence, however.&nbsp; Programs that create tasks for a computer are not intelligent programs.&nbsp; Usually, in our time, they are simply malware.&nbsp; The other programs that do this do so with a result that is guaranteed to be within the boundaries of the law.&nbsp; These programs aren&#039;t intelligent.&nbsp; They are simply useful if they address a need.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 1088010, member: 32547"] "AI" is the product of a human being, not a human being itself, nor capable of any action of its own right or origin. The human behind the program is responsible for the actions of the computer hosting the program he writes if there is negligence in the program's creation. "AI" cannot possibly bring success, because human intelligence is always greater. So if a human writes a program and profits from the sale of the program, the human is culpable as a business owner (owner of the product rights) for any illegal activity associated with the program itself, which can be attributed to negligence. This could possibly even include illegal activity that is intentionally initiated by a purchaser of the [unaltered] software, if the purchaser intended to engage in illegal activity. If the human writes the program for his own use, and the computer(s) running the program is found to be associated with criminally illegal activity under the law, the human who wrote the program is criminally liable and possibly civilly in the form of a lawsuit. In any case, the creator of a product is responsible for creating a product which could never be used to commit an illegal action or even could be randomly associated to someone by illegal activity. The law goes to great lengths to eliminate the dangers of products through regulations for use or ownership of a product or by requiring instructions for use and warning labels. These requirements should, ideally, protect all from misdeeds. If not, then there are legalities to address with the product. "AI" is malware, honestly. It is malware in the sense that it is a bad idea. That said, a program that could generate temporarily a small program guaranteed to function within the boundaries of the law would be fine, so long as the host program cannot be associated with illegal activity. It is an insult to intelligence to intimate that "AI" is intelligence, however. Programs that create tasks for a computer are not intelligent programs. Usually, in our time, they are simply malware. The other programs that do this do so with a result that is guaranteed to be within the boundaries of the law. These programs aren't intelligent. They are simply useful if they address a need. [/QUOTE]

Verification