Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Protecting processes from injection via SetWindowsHookEx() ?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 65228" data-source="post: 730804"><p>See:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In regards to legality for RCE, it wouldn't be appropriate for me to comment on this considering I am not a lawyer. However, what I can tell you, is that having a proper legally binding Terms of Service and Privacy Policy is critical and I advise you speak to a lawyer who works in the computer law area.</p><p></p><p>I don't think that relying on RCE so you can patch NtUserQueryWindow is a good idea and a good use of time but this is not my project; you can make whatever decisions you want to make. At the end of the day, all I can do is provide my opinion, it is down to you in the end to make a decision on what you should do for your project.</p><p></p><p></p><p>DSEFix is for bypassing Driver Signature Enforcement (DSE) which is a feature of PatchGuard to load an unsigned device driver through exploitation of the VirtualBox device driver. It works by patching kernel-memory for CI.dll which is loaded under the address space of NTOSKRNL and setup at system boot.</p><p></p><p>I don't see what this has to do with preventing global window hooks though.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, you *could* start by making signatures for open-source projects like these. Most vendors block such projects AFAIK... Especially Mimikatz.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 65228, post: 730804"] See: In regards to legality for RCE, it wouldn't be appropriate for me to comment on this considering I am not a lawyer. However, what I can tell you, is that having a proper legally binding Terms of Service and Privacy Policy is critical and I advise you speak to a lawyer who works in the computer law area. I don't think that relying on RCE so you can patch NtUserQueryWindow is a good idea and a good use of time but this is not my project; you can make whatever decisions you want to make. At the end of the day, all I can do is provide my opinion, it is down to you in the end to make a decision on what you should do for your project. DSEFix is for bypassing Driver Signature Enforcement (DSE) which is a feature of PatchGuard to load an unsigned device driver through exploitation of the VirtualBox device driver. It works by patching kernel-memory for CI.dll which is loaded under the address space of NTOSKRNL and setup at system boot. I don't see what this has to do with preventing global window hooks though. Anyway, you *could* start by making signatures for open-source projects like these. Most vendors block such projects AFAIK... Especially Mimikatz. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top