Qihoo Total Security VS Eset Smart Security 8
- Thread starter Ajay123
- Start date
Hi,
Both products (ESET Smart Security and Qihoo) are good. ESET has good HIPS and have very good signatures and Qihoo has very good heuristics. However, I should also note Qihoo does have some false positives... :O
ESET:
- Lightweight
- Good signatures and a outstanding detection rate (check Malware Hub for more information on it's detection, or do some tests yourself. They are one of the best in my opinion).
- Good HIPS protection (can also be tweaked to be more secure and to receive better protection)
- Good user interface (I like the ESET interface)
- Never experienced any crashing issues before (whilst running a stable OS (this excludes Windows 10 testing I have done of course...), I have never experienced ESET kernel mode drivers or in general to return a BSOD due to a issue. Neither, have I ever experienced it crash. It's very stable. I have experienced crashes/BSOD with other security software in the past).
Qihoo:
- Can anyone let me know if it is lightweight?
- Good Heuristics which pickup a lot of malware (good zero day heuristics in my opinion).
- Good HIPS (in my opinion)
- Good User Interface (I like the UI
)
Usually I see ESET and Qihoo at the very top with detection.
Both products (ESET Smart Security and Qihoo) are good. ESET has good HIPS and have very good signatures and Qihoo has very good heuristics. However, I should also note Qihoo does have some false positives... :O
ESET:
- Lightweight
- Good signatures and a outstanding detection rate (check Malware Hub for more information on it's detection, or do some tests yourself. They are one of the best in my opinion).
- Good HIPS protection (can also be tweaked to be more secure and to receive better protection)
- Good user interface (I like the ESET interface)
- Never experienced any crashing issues before (whilst running a stable OS (this excludes Windows 10 testing I have done of course...), I have never experienced ESET kernel mode drivers or in general to return a BSOD due to a issue. Neither, have I ever experienced it crash. It's very stable. I have experienced crashes/BSOD with other security software in the past).
Qihoo:
- Can anyone let me know if it is lightweight?
- Good Heuristics which pickup a lot of malware (good zero day heuristics in my opinion).
- Good HIPS (in my opinion)
- Good User Interface (I like the UI
)Usually I see ESET and Qihoo at the very top with detection.
- Oct 14, 2014
- 496
All have their respective traits but I choose ESET Smart Security 8.
-Very low resource usage
-Very low system impact
-User friendly
-Great signatures
-Great website filter
-Very responsive
It's a win-win situation with ESET.
Happy holidays!
-Very low resource usage
-Very low system impact
-User friendly
-Great signatures
-Great website filter
-Very responsive
It's a win-win situation with ESET.
Happy holidays!
- Mar 15, 2011
- 13,070
ESET Smart Security 8 =one of the best choice for paid suites.
Qihoo Total Security = one of the best choice for free suites.
Actually when it comes from pure components that made from their own then its for ESET cause its been proved to be very effective at all matters.
Meanwhile for Qihoo TS very much effective for those wanted full locked protection due to numerous engines licensed.
Qihoo Total Security = one of the best choice for free suites.
Actually when it comes from pure components that made from their own then its for ESET cause its been proved to be very effective at all matters.
Meanwhile for Qihoo TS very much effective for those wanted full locked protection due to numerous engines licensed.
- Jun 5, 2013
- 835
I used to use Qihoo happily until I began finding things such as Windows Updates being blocked because of the Proactive Defence. I suggest if you are a user, go check the logs and see if anything has been blocked (by default, anything over 30 days old will have been purged from the records). Of course, 360 has a good cloud, and very nice heuristics, but if you have no connection then you only have offline databases which are probably over 12 hours old. So even though I could disable the Proactive Defence, still it isn't good enough for my taste. This is not to mention another, perhaps more serious problem which is that the Proactive Defence executable file is always busy, no mater what settings it has.
Baidu isn't good enough either. It's obvious that they're serious about their antivirus, because they've clearly invested a lot of money in it. But the problem is you simply don't see this investment resulting in fixes for old problems like the very slow Avira database updates, for example. It seems that the actual antivirus functions are not their main concern with this product.
avast! is a solid free option. Bitdefender may be a good free set-and-forget option. Both are good paid choices. Norton, ESET and Kaspersky would probably be better, though, although using the 30-day trial versions and analysing details of each program would be ideal for you to make a choice. Webroot was buggy when I tested it, didn't like it much anyway, so I don't recommend it.
I'm using Lavasoft Ad-Aware Free, for me the best Bitdefender-based choice in free editions. Stable, good interface, database updates are on par with Bitdefender, no additional components are installed if they are not used, does not nag you (only asks if you'd like to recommend it in social media after cleaning infections, nothing obtrusive).
For extra heuristics, I use Kompas AV as a companion.
Also you may not need an Internet Security package, sometimes a simple AV with Windows Firewall is enough. Sometimes less is more, fewer programs equal more stability, and sometimes even more safety.
Baidu isn't good enough either. It's obvious that they're serious about their antivirus, because they've clearly invested a lot of money in it. But the problem is you simply don't see this investment resulting in fixes for old problems like the very slow Avira database updates, for example. It seems that the actual antivirus functions are not their main concern with this product.
avast! is a solid free option. Bitdefender may be a good free set-and-forget option. Both are good paid choices. Norton, ESET and Kaspersky would probably be better, though, although using the 30-day trial versions and analysing details of each program would be ideal for you to make a choice. Webroot was buggy when I tested it, didn't like it much anyway, so I don't recommend it.
I'm using Lavasoft Ad-Aware Free, for me the best Bitdefender-based choice in free editions. Stable, good interface, database updates are on par with Bitdefender, no additional components are installed if they are not used, does not nag you (only asks if you'd like to recommend it in social media after cleaning infections, nothing obtrusive).
For extra heuristics, I use Kompas AV as a companion.
Also you may not need an Internet Security package, sometimes a simple AV with Windows Firewall is enough. Sometimes less is more, fewer programs equal more stability, and sometimes even more safety.
- Nov 4, 2013
- 468
- Nov 12, 2014
- 89
http://www.av-test.org/en/news/news...dows-81-24-security-packages-put-to-the-test/ Guys please take a look ..
Last edited by a moderator:
- Oct 2, 2014
- 805
You need to use your own brain before opening threads like this. If you are just going to use whatever everyone else uses then you can't choose by yourself, leting someone else to do your job isn't great at all. Please, there is no real winner since they key for safety is your brain, AV's in general are a plus and most of them specific depending on user needs.
Last edited:
On one hand I agree with you 100 % but on the other hand I beg to differ.
I totally agree with what you wrote above about using one's own brain & making your own choices.
But then again the purpose of forums like Malware Tips is to advise, guide & recommend to those who are not as
knowledgeable as the Gurus here on Malware Tips. Just my two cents.
- Oct 2, 2014
- 805
I agree with you, why would you ask who's the winner at uber av 1 vs deluxe edition 2 av. There are plenty of tests all over the forums, there are reviews, technical info. There are the own AV websites feature list, that works. Asking who's best equals to no real answer.
- Status
Similar threads
