Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Question about tests...
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120479" data-attributes="member: 121355"><p>The test is manipulated. Eset was an older version with an update 4 or 5 months old (I don't remember exactly), outdated. And secondly, Leo doesn't understand that in Eset all modules are like communicating vessels. This is not the first time that a security module in Eset disables something. I wonder why it doesn't disable something in other AVs?</p><p></p><p>I would be blind if Eset lost the game on equal terms, but I wouldn't admit it. I'm a bigger fan of BD myself and I've already written about it in another topic. But this test is a manipulation.</p><p>Eset is not completely useless against the unknown malware. There are much worse and numerous AV solutions on the market.</p><p>It's great that you have Avast. And in my opinion, it doesn't even come close to Eset and is even worse against the unknown malware.</p><p></p><p>However, each test is different. And basing an opinion on one manipulated test is not serious. This applies to every solution.</p><p></p><p>Now Eset also has LiveGuard which works and it looks completely different and above all better with new threats. Wait half a year until more tests of the new Eset appear. Those that are already there are very promising. And if it works as it is in theory, you will be singing a different song in half a year <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120479, member: 121355"] The test is manipulated. Eset was an older version with an update 4 or 5 months old (I don't remember exactly), outdated. And secondly, Leo doesn't understand that in Eset all modules are like communicating vessels. This is not the first time that a security module in Eset disables something. I wonder why it doesn't disable something in other AVs? I would be blind if Eset lost the game on equal terms, but I wouldn't admit it. I'm a bigger fan of BD myself and I've already written about it in another topic. But this test is a manipulation. Eset is not completely useless against the unknown malware. There are much worse and numerous AV solutions on the market. It's great that you have Avast. And in my opinion, it doesn't even come close to Eset and is even worse against the unknown malware. However, each test is different. And basing an opinion on one manipulated test is not serious. This applies to every solution. Now Eset also has LiveGuard which works and it looks completely different and above all better with new threats. Wait half a year until more tests of the new Eset appear. Those that are already there are very promising. And if it works as it is in theory, you will be singing a different song in half a year ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top