App Review QuickHeal Total Security 2026

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
Content created by
Shadowra

Shadowra

Level 40
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Tester
Well-known
High Reputation
Forum Veteran
Sep 2, 2021
2,969
37,853
3,880
29
France
QuickHeal is an Indian software publisher and competitor of K7 Antivirus.
Although little known to the general public, it is quite well known in India.

QuickHeal has announced a number of developments for 2026, including AI machine learning, enhanced behavioral protection, and more.
Let's take a look...



Interface :

The product interface hasn't changed much since 2025.
Surprisingly, MetaProtect is an add-on to the antivirus software... why charge extra for it if it offers something extra?
In any case, the product is certainly attractive, colorful, and above all very easy to use, but it still puts a heavy load on the system...

Web protection: 6/9
QuickHeal blocked 6 out of 9 links, and 4 infections got through. Average.

Fake crack : N/A
The sample is too old and the site that distributed it was down.
Skipped.

Malware Pack : Remaining 59 threats out of 79
QuickHeal's anti-malware engine is completely inactive.
However, it tries to defend itself as best it can by intercepting several attacks.
But it quickly becomes overwhelmed with missed infections, and the machine is soon inundated with infections.
After the pack, I test a sample of LokiLocker. After it manages to execute, QuickHeal fortunately prevents the files from being encrypted (even though the ransomware manages to access other partitions).
While its behavioral protection has evolved, it still remains very average...

Final scan :
QuickHeal : 0
NPE : 21 (QuickHeal detects a TMP file when displaying results)
KVRT : 24 (Memory Infected)


Final opinion:

QuickHeal is an antivirus program that is trying to evolve, but slowly.
I am quite surprised that MetaProtect is not included in the program, as I was unable to test it.
What surprised me was that QuickHeal performed very poorly in the antimalware scan, becoming a very bad scanner in the tests.
However, it is trying to improve its proactive protection, even though it is still very average.
Not yet recommended.

@Captain Awesome request
 
And yet at 7:05, it says your device is "safe to use", is very misleading on its part, is clueless? Also, one of my AV deciding factors is the Web protection, it doesn't instill a sense of my confidence in that either, with the samples/links missed.

Great test as always, Shadowra :) :)
 
Last edited:
Also, one of my AV deciding factors is the Web protection, it doesn't instill a sense of my confidence in that either, with the samples/links missed.
:)
Agreed. This is why I reinstalled ESET, web protection, Hard_Configorator/AppGuard is great but I want that web protection just incase.
 
QuickHeal is an Indian software publisher and competitor of K7 Antivirus.
Although little known to the general public, it is quite well known in India.

QuickHeal has announced a number of developments for 2026, including AI machine learning, enhanced behavioral protection, and more.
Let's take a look...



Interface :

The product interface hasn't changed much since 2025.
Surprisingly, MetaProtect is an add-on to the antivirus software... why charge extra for it if it offers something extra?
In any case, the product is certainly attractive, colorful, and above all very easy to use, but it still puts a heavy load on the system...

Web protection: 6/9
QuickHeal blocked 6 out of 9 links, and 4 infections got through. Average.

Fake crack : N/A
The sample is too old and the site that distributed it was down.
Skipped.

Malware Pack : Remaining 59 threats out of 79
QuickHeal's anti-malware engine is completely inactive.
However, it tries to defend itself as best it can by intercepting several attacks.
But it quickly becomes overwhelmed with missed infections, and the machine is soon inundated with infections.
After the pack, I test a sample of LokiLocker. After it manages to execute, QuickHeal fortunately prevents the files from being encrypted (even though the ransomware manages to access other partitions).
While its behavioral protection has evolved, it still remains very average...

Final scan :
QuickHeal : 0
NPE : 21 (QuickHeal detects a TMP file when displaying results)
KVRT : 24 (Memory Infected)


Final opinion:

QuickHeal is an antivirus program that is trying to evolve, but slowly.
I am quite surprised that MetaProtect is not included in the program, as I was unable to test it.
What surprised me was that QuickHeal performed very poorly in the antimalware scan, becoming a very bad scanner in the tests.
However, it is trying to improve its proactive protection, even though it is still very average.
Not yet recommended.

@Captain Awesome request

It’s game over for Quick Heal, as if the recent Makop ransomware attack wasn’t already the final nail in the coffin.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your kind effort and precise results.

The results augment my concerns regarding certain lab tests accuracy.

2025-12-20_08-15-17.png



2025-12-20_08-15-41.png
 
QuickHeal is an Indian software publisher and competitor of K7 Antivirus.
Although little known to the general public, it is quite well known in India.

QuickHeal has announced a number of developments for 2026, including AI machine learning, enhanced behavioral protection, and more.
Let's take a look...



Interface :

The product interface hasn't changed much since 2025.
Surprisingly, MetaProtect is an add-on to the antivirus software... why charge extra for it if it offers something extra?
In any case, the product is certainly attractive, colorful, and above all very easy to use, but it still puts a heavy load on the system...

Web protection: 6/9
QuickHeal blocked 6 out of 9 links, and 4 infections got through. Average.

Fake crack : N/A
The sample is too old and the site that distributed it was down.
Skipped.

Malware Pack : Remaining 59 threats out of 79
QuickHeal's anti-malware engine is completely inactive.
However, it tries to defend itself as best it can by intercepting several attacks.
But it quickly becomes overwhelmed with missed infections, and the machine is soon inundated with infections.
After the pack, I test a sample of LokiLocker. After it manages to execute, QuickHeal fortunately prevents the files from being encrypted (even though the ransomware manages to access other partitions).
While its behavioral protection has evolved, it still remains very average...

Final scan :
QuickHeal : 0
NPE : 21 (QuickHeal detects a TMP file when displaying results)
KVRT : 24 (Memory Infected)


Final opinion:

QuickHeal is an antivirus program that is trying to evolve, but slowly.
I am quite surprised that MetaProtect is not included in the program, as I was unable to test it.
What surprised me was that QuickHeal performed very poorly in the antimalware scan, becoming a very bad scanner in the tests.
However, it is trying to improve its proactive protection, even though it is still very average.
Not yet recommended.

@Captain Awesome request

Thank you @Shadowra for your test. I am using ESET & I love to use it, but also I prefer K7. (No changes in their Antivirus Premium MAT edition since a long time). QH is very poor AV.
 
And yet at 7:05, it says your device is "safe to use", is very misleading on its part, is clueless? Also, one of my AV deciding factors is the Web protection, it doesn't instill a sense of my confidence in that either, with the samples/links missed.

Great test as always, Shadowra :) :)
In my very very long life I have seen many fads etc come and go but one thing remained constant: Never trust a company that names itself after what it's attempting to solve. 99% of the time its antiphrasis of its function. For example "Quick Heal" is neither quick nor it heals.

Or people that call themselves a "good person" or a "gentleman".
 
Thank you for your kind effort and precise results.

The results augment my concerns regarding certain lab tests accuracy.

View attachment 293897


View attachment 293898
I lost all trust in Avlab accuracy after seeing them award a 100% detection to webroot. I was like "drops mic; peace"