Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="David R" data-source="post: 636155" data-attributes="member: 62832">I am not associated with the Cylance company in any way, but have had the opportunity to test first hand. I&#039;m very familiar with their product and the ways you can configure it. The video you that was posted by VS seems really sketchy, I&#039;ll have to be honest. Can you provide the source of the malware samples that were used? I&#039;d like to verify them myself.The application whitelisting option is also disabled. Never use that for reasons you mentioned: it&#039;s not practical or user-friendly in any way. The test I did with 100 samples earlier was not using script, memory or application control/blocking. The lab I had set up was completely offline (one advantage to Cylance over other products) and it worked brilliantly. I have definitely found some false negatives myself (as with pretty much every other vendor), but not even close to the efficacy rating in the video.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="David R, post: 636155, member: 62832"] I am not associated with the Cylance company in any way, but have had the opportunity to test first hand. I'm very familiar with their product and the ways you can configure it. The video you that was posted by VS seems really sketchy, I'll have to be honest. Can you provide the source of the malware samples that were used? I'd like to verify them myself. The application whitelisting option is also disabled. Never use that for reasons you mentioned: it's not practical or user-friendly in any way. The test I did with 100 samples earlier was not using script, memory or application control/blocking. The lab I had set up was completely offline (one advantage to Cylance over other products) and it worked brilliantly. I have definitely found some false negatives myself (as with pretty much every other vendor), but not even close to the efficacy rating in the video. [/QUOTE]

Verification