Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Ransomware Test: Cylance, Sophos, VoodooShield | by VoodooShield
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 636162" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>Hehehe, David... I posted all of the hashes and offered to provide all of the samples to anyone who wanted them... has ANY vendor EVER done that before? How more open and honest could a test possibly be? I would be happy to send you the files. Please email me at support at voodooshield.com and I will send them to you.</p><p></p><p>You need to be very careful here... there is at least one indication that tells me that there is a high probability that you have never ran VS...</p><p>"The application whitelisting option is also disabled" is not a this is not a "thing" in VS!!!</p><p></p><p>Can you please provide the approximate date and time that you ran the tests of 100 samples? I would like to look them up in the database to see how VS and VoodooAi performed.</p><p></p><p>On a side note... if you tried VS for a few days, you would realize that we have reduced the number of "safe" blocks to next to nothing. I know this because I have to reset my whitelist almost daily for dev reasons, and I cannot remember the last time I had a block. I also know this because when I am performing maintenance for a client, they might ask me about a block, so I will look at the logs and notice that there are not that many... every time.</p><p></p><p>I completely agree about the false negatives in AutoPilot mode... it is difficult or impossible for ANY traditional AV or ML/Ai engine to consistently achieve an efficacy above 95% (or whatever number you want to use).</p><p></p><p>But then again, that is just further proof that the endpoint should be locked when it is at risk... you will never convince me otherwise <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 636162, member: 62850"] Hehehe, David... I posted all of the hashes and offered to provide all of the samples to anyone who wanted them... has ANY vendor EVER done that before? How more open and honest could a test possibly be? I would be happy to send you the files. Please email me at support at voodooshield.com and I will send them to you. You need to be very careful here... there is at least one indication that tells me that there is a high probability that you have never ran VS... "The application whitelisting option is also disabled" is not a this is not a "thing" in VS!!! Can you please provide the approximate date and time that you ran the tests of 100 samples? I would like to look them up in the database to see how VS and VoodooAi performed. On a side note... if you tried VS for a few days, you would realize that we have reduced the number of "safe" blocks to next to nothing. I know this because I have to reset my whitelist almost daily for dev reasons, and I cannot remember the last time I had a block. I also know this because when I am performing maintenance for a client, they might ask me about a block, so I will look at the logs and notice that there are not that many... every time. I completely agree about the false negatives in AutoPilot mode... it is difficult or impossible for ANY traditional AV or ML/Ai engine to consistently achieve an efficacy above 95% (or whatever number you want to use). But then again, that is just further proof that the endpoint should be locked when it is at risk... you will never convince me otherwise ;). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top