Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Real-World Protection Test Feb-Mar 2020
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bonorex" data-source="post: 905030" data-attributes="member: 87946"><p>In my opinion, false positives could be as problematic as real detections. If a security program is known as giving too much false positives, than some users might be tempted to bypass a warning, thinking it's a false positive and get infected. Users may always find justifications why a security suite gave a false positive: very uncommon progam, too old,... The fact is that a professional antivirus should give zero (or close to zero) false positives, no matter how old or widespread a program is. If we look at false positives results there is always a common pattern: some programs always give above average number of false positives, while other never give false positives. Programs like Bitdefender, Kaspersky and ESET are so good, that they give almost no false positives, no matter which websites or programs someone uses to test them. Test after test they always get perfect results. This gives a great confidence in the program, since users know, that when their antivirus displays a critical warning, is almost certainly justified.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bonorex, post: 905030, member: 87946"] In my opinion, false positives could be as problematic as real detections. If a security program is known as giving too much false positives, than some users might be tempted to bypass a warning, thinking it's a false positive and get infected. Users may always find justifications why a security suite gave a false positive: very uncommon progam, too old,... The fact is that a professional antivirus should give zero (or close to zero) false positives, no matter how old or widespread a program is. If we look at false positives results there is always a common pattern: some programs always give above average number of false positives, while other never give false positives. Programs like Bitdefender, Kaspersky and ESET are so good, that they give almost no false positives, no matter which websites or programs someone uses to test them. Test after test they always get perfect results. This gives a great confidence in the program, since users know, that when their antivirus displays a critical warning, is almost certainly justified. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top