Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hardware
Hardware Discussions
Samsung PM830 128gb or Kingston A400 120gb
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JiSingh12" data-source="post: 762700" data-attributes="member: 74685"><p>2.5" PM830 Mobile/Client Edition vs A400:</p><p></p><p>Both use Sata Rev/Gen 3.0 which runs at 6Gb/s, which is the current highest.</p><p>PM380 uses 20nm MLC, while A400 uses 15nm TLC. </p><p>PM380 uses AES-256 encryption, while A400 has none.</p><p>Samsung uses an in-house controller while Kingston uses a rebranded Phison S11.</p><p>Samsung has an estimated 1.5million MTBF against 1 million hours MTBF of life expectancy.</p><p>The Samsung has a higher guaranteed Write Endurance (Terabytes Written) of up to 60TBW vs 40TBW.</p><p>Samsung is rated at Peak 500MB/s Read and 400MB/s write, against a baseline of 500MB/s read and 320MB/s write, but this changes depending on hardware, software, motherboard etc.</p><p></p><p>Overall, it depends on your needs. Is encryption necessary, or the 20nm TLC vs the newer but cheaper 15nm TLC? If you are a casual user then i do not think the better flash or encryption is needed.</p><p>The Kingston is not even 2 years old yet, while the Samsung is like 7 years old.</p><p>Performance wise, the Kingston has hit over 500MB/s in both read and write in tests.</p><p></p><p>Personally i would go with the Kingston.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JiSingh12, post: 762700, member: 74685"] 2.5" PM830 Mobile/Client Edition vs A400: Both use Sata Rev/Gen 3.0 which runs at 6Gb/s, which is the current highest. PM380 uses 20nm MLC, while A400 uses 15nm TLC. PM380 uses AES-256 encryption, while A400 has none. Samsung uses an in-house controller while Kingston uses a rebranded Phison S11. Samsung has an estimated 1.5million MTBF against 1 million hours MTBF of life expectancy. The Samsung has a higher guaranteed Write Endurance (Terabytes Written) of up to 60TBW vs 40TBW. Samsung is rated at Peak 500MB/s Read and 400MB/s write, against a baseline of 500MB/s read and 320MB/s write, but this changes depending on hardware, software, motherboard etc. Overall, it depends on your needs. Is encryption necessary, or the 20nm TLC vs the newer but cheaper 15nm TLC? If you are a casual user then i do not think the better flash or encryption is needed. The Kingston is not even 2 years old yet, while the Samsung is like 7 years old. Performance wise, the Kingston has hit over 500MB/s in both read and write in tests. Personally i would go with the Kingston. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top