Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nightwalker" data-source="post: 818433" data-attributes="member: 23015">I fully agree with you and I will try to be a little more patient, but I wont promise anything more <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite126" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL&nbsp; &nbsp; :ROFLMAO:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" />One very interesting thing in this test is the difference between AVG/Avast, for everything we know they share the same engine and cloud, just different skins and marketing priorities.I guess AVG was tested earlier and it may had some positive implications for Avast (cloud + machine learning), but it is just a speculation (this can have implications for all others vendors).It isnt wise to benchmark antivirus performance based in just one test, but with many tests from different organizations plus independent testing, it can give us a overall picture of how security vendors are doing in the real world (like Kaspersky and now Windows Defender consistency).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nightwalker, post: 818433, member: 23015"] I fully agree with you and I will try to be a little more patient, but I wont promise anything more :ROFLMAO: One very interesting thing in this test is the difference between AVG/Avast, for everything we know they share the same engine and cloud, just different skins and marketing priorities. I guess AVG was tested earlier and it may had some positive implications for Avast (cloud + machine learning), but it is just a speculation (this can have implications for all others vendors). It isnt wise to benchmark antivirus performance based in just one test, but with many tests from different organizations plus independent testing, it can give us a overall picture of how security vendors are doing in the real world (like Kaspersky and now Windows Defender consistency). [/QUOTE]

Verification