Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 818506" data-attributes="member: 32260">There are some well known AVs which are better than WD in SE Labs tests.WD is better in SE Labs tests than some well known AVs.Average results from 12 months (Total Accuracy Rating):Norton Security ............................ 99.5ESET Smart Security .................... 99Kaspersky Internet Security ......... 99Windows Defender ....................... 98.5Trend Micro Internet Security ...... 97.25McAfee Internet Security ............. 96.75F-Secure .........................................94.75Because of big statistical errors, I can cautiously say that in SE labs tests Norton is better than F-Secure.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />I cannot say that Norton Security is generally better (as protection) for home users, because no one knows what it means and how it can be measured.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 818506, member: 32260"] There are some well known AVs which are better than WD in SE Labs tests. WD is better in SE Labs tests than some well known AVs. Average results from 12 months (Total Accuracy Rating): Norton Security ............................ 99.5 ESET Smart Security .................... 99 Kaspersky Internet Security ......... 99 Windows Defender ....................... 98.5 Trend Micro Internet Security ...... 97.25 McAfee Internet Security ............. 96.75 F-Secure .........................................94.75 Because of big statistical errors, I can cautiously say that in SE labs tests Norton is better than F-Secure.(y) I cannot say that Norton Security is generally better (as protection) for home users, because no one knows what it means and how it can be measured. [/QUOTE]

Verification